勛圖眻畦

Research & Publications

Access in-depth resources and analysis published by the 勛圖眻畦 regarding our most pressing civil liberties issues.

Featured

勛圖眻畦 2024 Annual Report

Read the Report

All Publications


Research & Analysis

“Summary Injustice” Exposes South Carolina Courts that Convict and Jail Many Defendants Without a Lawyer Present

After observing and investigating proceedings at 27 summary courts in South Carolina, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the 勛圖眻畦, and the 勛圖眻畦 of South Carolina together produced Summary Injustice: A Look at Constitutional Deficiencies in South Carolinas Summary Courts. These courts try and convict people accused of low-level offenses, routinely failing to adequately advise defendants that they have a constitutional right to a lawyer, whether they can afford to pay for one or not.

The report reveals other standard operating procedures that have no place in the American justice system. The police who arrest defendants act as their prosecutors, the judges arent required to have a law degree, and defense lawyers are a rarity. With no lawyers in the courtrooms, errors that result in increased punishments for the defendants go unnoticed. The report details the cases of several defendants and their sentences.

Municipal courts which are one kind of summary courtare flourishing in South Carolina because they make money for their towns coffers by collecting fees and fines.

The court-watching for Summary Injustice was conducted between December 2014 and July 2015. The report is the first step in the 勛圖眻畦 and the National Criminal Defense Lawyers Associations joint investigation of South Carolinas summary courts. Together we are gathering data from magistrate and municipal courts in several counties across the state, and our next report will offer recommendations for reforms that will ensure South Carolinians access to their constitutional right to an attorney.

Issue Areas: Criminal Law Reform

Research & Analysis

Lethal in Disguise: The Health Consequences of Crowd-Control Weapons

Over the past number of years, crowd-control weapons (CCWs) are increasingly being used in responding to popular protests. In a joint report Lethal in Disguise: The Health Consequences of Crowd-Control Weapons, The International Network of Civil Liberties Organizations (INCLO) and Physicians for Human Rights have documented the health consequences of these weapons. The report aims to raise awareness about the misuse and abuse of CCWs, the detrimental health effects that these weapons can have, and the impact of their use on the meaningful enjoyment of freedom of assembly and expression. It also seeks to foster a global debate to develop international standards and guidelines on the use of CCWs with the ultimate goal of preventing injury, disability and death by providing information on these weapons and insisting on their safe use.

Fact Sheets Related to this Report:

Issue Areas: Free Speech, Human Rights

Research & Analysis

Negligencia Mortal: El ICE pasa por alto las muertes en el Sistema de detención

En este informe se examinan flagrantes violaciones a las normas sobre atenci籀n m矇dica establecidas por el propio Servicio de Inmigraci籀n y Control de Aduanas de los Estados Unidos (ICE, por sus siglas en ingl矇s), que tuvieron un papel importante en ocho de las defunciones de personas que se encontraban bajo custodia, ocurridas desde 2010 hasta 2012. Un an獺lisis efectuado por la Uni籀n Americana de Libertades Civiles (勛圖眻畦, por sus siglas en ingl矇s), Detention Watch Network (DWN por sus siglas en ingl矇s), y el Centro Nacional de Justicia para Inmigrantes (NJIC, por sus siglas en ingl矇s), acerca de las investigaciones hechas por el ICE sobre las muertes y los informes de inspecci籀n de los establecimientos revela que si bien los informes del propio ICE detectaron violaciones de sus normas m矇dicas como factores contribuyentes a esas muertes, las inspecciones de los establecimientos de detenci籀n del ICE efectuadas antes y despu矇s de estas defunciones no reconocieron, y en ocasiones hasta desestimaron, las fallas fundamentales identificadas en las investigaciones sobre las muertes.

Issue Areas: Immigrants' Rights

Research & Analysis

Fatal Neglect: How ICE Ignores Death in Detention

Egregious violations of ICE medical care standards played a prominent role in eight deaths in immigration detention facilities from 2010 to 2012. Fatal Neglect: How ICE Ignores Deaths in Detention, a report jointly produced by the 勛圖眻畦, Detention Watch Network, and National Immigrant Justice Center, examines these deaths and the agencys response to them. Our research shows that even though ICE conducted reviews that identified violations of medical standards as contributing factors in these deaths, routine ICE detention facility inspections before and after the deaths failed to acknowledgeor at times dismissedthese violations. Instead of forcing changes in culture, systems, and processes that could reduce future deaths, ICEs deficient inspections system essentially swept the agencys own death review findings under the rug.

Issue Areas: Immigrants' Rights

Research & Analysis

Racial Disparities in Florida Safety Belt Law Enforcement

Black motorists in Florida are stopped and ticketed for seatbelt violations in far greater numbers than white motorists nearly twice as often statewide and up to four times as often in certain counties according to a new report from the 勛圖眻畦. The 勛圖眻畦 is calling for investigation by the Florida Attorney General's Office of Civil Rights and County Commissions charged with oversight over specific law enforcement agencies.

The 勛圖眻畦s analysis is based on publicly available data reported by law enforcement agencies across Florida pursuant to the Florida Safety Belt Law. The law requires each agency to annually report to state officials the race and ethnicity of every recipient of a ticket for violating seatbelt requirements. The data is published annually by the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. Analysis of the most recent statewide seatbelt citation data shows the law has been applied much more often to Black motorists than to white motorists.

In 2014, Black motorists across Florida were stopped and ticketed for seatbelt violations at nearly twice the rate as white motorists overall. Seatbelt enforcement by specific county sheriffs departments resulted in even greater disparities. Black motorists were stopped and cited:

4 times more often than white motorists by the Escambia County Sheriffs Office in 2011 (the most recent year that this agency reported seatbelt citation data);
3 times more often than white motorists by the Palm Beach County Sheriffs Office in 2014;
2.8 times more often than white motorists by the Orange County Sheriffs Office in 2014

The report notes that the differences in seatbelt-wearing behavior between Black and white people, as documented by statewide and national studies, do not explain the racial disparities in seatbelt citation rates identified in this report. It also identifies law enforcement agencies that have failed to comply with the Florida Safety Belt Laws data collection and reporting requirement.

In addition to calling for investigation into the causes of these racial disparities, the 勛圖眻畦 seeks legislation that would, going forward, penalize law enforcement agencies that fail to comply with the statutes reporting requirement, and recommends that law enforcement collect and analyze data for all traffic and pedestrian stops. It also calls on law enforcement agencies to take promote fair and impartial policing by providing testing on implicit bias, training on bias-free policing to all officers, and supervision and retraining officers whose stop-and-citation practices result in large racial disparities.

Learn more: Black Motorists in Florida Cited for Seatbelt Violations Nearly Twice as Often as White Motorists

This report was amended on April 24, 2016. A description of amendments can be found on pages 36-38.

Issue Areas: Racial Justice

勛圖眻畦 Magazine

Published twice a year, 勛圖眻畦 Magazine shares updates on the 勛圖眻畦's critical litigation and advocacy work across the country and tells the stories of the activists, attorneys, and clients at the heart of each case and campaign. To receive 勛圖眻畦 Magazine by mail, become a monthly donor today.