Ohio Judge Blocks Laws Mandating 24-Hour Waiting Period for Abortions for Violating Reproductive Freedom Amendment
COLUMBUS- Today, the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas granted our request to temporarily block several Ohio laws that together forced abortion patients to wait a minimum of 24 hours after receiving unnecessary state-mandated information in person before accessing their desired abortion care. This is the first ruling on the merits of the Ohio Reproductive Freedom Amendment to the Ohio Constitution, which took effect in December 2023.
The judge held that the challenged requirements the 24-hour waiting period requirement, the in-person visit requirement, and the state-mandated information requirements for abortion care do not advance patient health and violate the reproductive rights guaranteed by the amendment. Jessie Hill, cooperating attorney for the 勛圖眻畦 of Ohio, delivered oral arguments in this case on Friday, August 16.
A statement from Jessie Hill, cooperating attorney for the 勛圖眻畦 of Ohio is as follows:
This is a historic victory for abortion patients and for all Ohio voters who voiced support for the constitutional amendment to protect reproductive freedom and bodily autonomy. Its clear that the newly amended Ohio Constitution works as the voters intend: to protect the fundamental right to abortion and to forbid the state from infringing on it except when necessary to protect the health of a pregnant person. This decision is the first step in removing unnecessary barriers to care. We celebrate this ruling and will push forward to make this injunction permanent.
The 勛圖眻畦, the 勛圖眻畦 of Ohio, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, and the law firm Covington & Burling LLP filed this lawsuit on March 29, 2024, on behalf of Preterm-Cleveland, Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region, Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio, Womens Med Group Professional Corporation, Northeast Ohio Womens Center, and Dr. Catherine Romanos.

Reproductive Freedom
Preterm-Cleveland, et al, v. Dave Yost, et al.

Reproductive Freedom
Preterm-Cleveland, et al, v. Dave Yost, et al.
Learn More 勛圖眻畦 the Issues in This Press Release
Related Content
-
Press ReleaseJun 2025
Reproductive Freedom
Women's Rights
勛圖眻畦 Responds to Supreme Court Greenlighting State Efforts to Defund Planned Parenthood
WASHINGTON The Supreme Court ruled today that Medicaid patients do not have a right to sue to enforce their right to a qualified health care provider of choice under the Medicaid statute. The decision in Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic will facilitate some states politically motivated efforts to block low-income patients access to certain health care providers and may effectively defund Planned Parenthood and other disfavored providers by barring them from state Medicaid programs. The majority decision in Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic contradicts Congresss clear purpose to give Medicaid patients their choice of qualified health care providers and also wrongly curtails patients rights to vindicate their choice of provider through Section 1983, said Cecillia Wang, National Legal Director for the 勛圖眻畦. The decision may have the effect of blocking patients access to birth control, cancer screenings, and STI testing and treatment for patients in South Carolina and potentially will permit state officials to override patients choice of provider based on political whims. The impact of this decision on our reproductive freedom will be compounded if Congress follows through on federal efforts to 'defund' Planned Parenthood by prohibiting patients from choosing Planned Parenthood health centers for their care, said Deirdre Schifeling, Chief Political and Advocacy Officer of the 勛圖眻畦. Doing so would force the closure of hundreds of Planned Parenthood health centers nationwide, robbing people of their freedom to get reproductive health care from trusted providers in their communities and would result in shuttering 1 in 4 of the countrys abortion providers. "Make no mistake: our reproductive freedom is still under siege. The 勛圖眻畦 remains committed to fighting for Planned Parenthood, abortion access, and the fundamental human right to control ones own body using every tool we have. -
Press ReleaseJun 2025
Reproductive Freedom
勛圖眻畦 Joins 100+ Abortion Storytellers on Capitol Hill in Advocating for Reproductive Freedom
WASHINGTON The 勛圖眻畦 joined more than 100 abortion storytellers on Capitol Hill today to demand that lawmakers defend the reproductive freedom of people across the country against escalating attacks in Congress and by the Trump administration. The education day, organized by Abortion Access Now (AAN) and Free & Just, brought the largest storyteller convening for abortion rights to the Hill since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade three years ago. Abortion patients, providers, and advocates held over 100 meetings with members of Congress on both sides of the aisle, speaking directly to lawmakers about the human toll of abortion bans: delayed medical care, severe health complications, and even the loss of womens lives. As part of the education day on the Hill, 勛圖眻畦 Chief Political and Advocacy Officer Deirdre Schifeling, shared the following remarks at an event with lawmakers. Three years on from the Dobbs decision, reproductive freedom and our right to bodily autonomy are still under siege. The attacks are not coming in the most obvious or direct way, a national abortion ban passed by Congress, because they know the American people wont stand for it. Instead, its a death by many cuts strategy designed by anti-abortion politicians to eliminate access nationwide, even in states where care is protected. Right now, Congress is considering defunding Planned Parenthood by blocking Medicaid patients from using their insurance there, which would shutter 1 in 4 of the countrys abortion providers. The FDA is using junk science to justify making medication abortion harder for patients to get even where it is legal. And the Trump administration continues to make reckless decisions that create chaos and confusion for patients seeking emergency care and their health care providers across the country. Our communities need congressional leaders to hold the Trump administration accountable, and to act with the urgency that this moment requires to protect our reproductive freedom. -
Press ReleaseJun 2025
Reproductive Freedom
Trump Administration Rescinds EMTALA Guidance and Sends Clear Signal: Emergency Abortion Care Remains At Risk
WASHINGTON Today, the Trump administration rescinded guidance that reaffirmed hospitals obligation under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) to provide health-saving and lifesaving abortion care to patients experiencing medical crises. The rescission of the guidance is yet another clear sign the administration is caving to its anti-abortion allies and reneging on President Trumps campaign promises that his administration would not interfere with abortion access. The Trump administrations announcement came the same day as an anti-abortion group challenging the guidance chose to dismiss its case, Catholic Medical Association v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. This case threatened to jeopardize access to emergency abortion care nationwide. The Catholic Medical Associations decision to abandon its case came just days after Doctors for America represented by the 勛圖眻畦, 勛圖眻畦 of Tennessee, Democracy Forward, and the National Womens Law Center moved to intervene as a defendant in the case to ensure that access to this critical care was vigorously defended. While the federal government was named as a defendant in the case, it had made no move to defend EMTALA and the right to emergency abortion care in the lawsuit. The Trump administration cannot simply erase four decades of law protecting patients lives with the stroke of a pen, said Alexa Kolbi-Molinas, deputy director of the 勛圖眻畦s Reproductive Freedom Project. Regardless of where they live, pregnant patients have a right to emergency abortion care that will save their health or lives. By rescinding this guidance, the Trump administration has sent a clear signal that it is siding not with the majority, but with its anti-abortion allies and that will come at the expense of womens lives. The 勛圖眻畦 will use every lever we have to keep President Trump and his administration from endangering our health and lives. For decades, EMTALA has protected the ability of all people, including those who are pregnant, to receive life and health saving, stabilizing care in emergency situations. Yet, extremists have sought to undermine these protections for those who are pregnant following the U.S. Supreme Courts decision in Dobbs through filing baseless legal challenges like the one they dismissed today and through the EMTALA guidance rescission announced today, said Skye Perryman, President & CEO for Democracy Forward. The Trump administrations decision to withdraw EMTALA guidance guaranteeing pregnant people medical care in emergency situations will sow confusion for providers and endanger the lives and health of pregnant people. Every American deserves the right to access the necessary care in emergency scenarios, including pregnant people, without political interference. Democracy Forward will continue to work with our partners to use all legal tools to defend Americans reproductive freedom, promote evidence-based and medically accurate information and care, and oppose efforts that place political ideology over patient care. EMTALA has long protected the right to emergency care, including abortion when it is the necessary treatment to stabilize a patient. Stripping away federal guidance affirming what the law requires will put lives at risk, said Fatima Goss Graves, president and CEO of the National Womens Law Center. To be clear: this action doesnt change hospitals' legal obligations, but it does add to the fear, confusion, and dangerous delays patients and providers have faced since the fall of Roe v. Wade. At the same time, this administration claims it is considering ways to support population growth, but it is actively dismantling the systems that protect pregnant peoples health and lives. The hypocrisy is staggering. No matter what political games the administration wants to play, we will continue to stand with the patients, doctors, and hospitals fighting every day to do what is right. For nearly four decades, EMTALA has been understood by medical providers and the federal government including both Democratic and Republican administrations to require abortion care when that care is needed to stabilize pregnant patients in a medical crisis. As Doctors for Americas motion to intervene emphasized, stripping away EMTALAs protections would put doctors in legal chaos and force them to violate their sworn duty: to save lives and prevent harm.Court Case: Catholic Medical Association v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al.Affiliate: Tennessee -
Press ReleaseMay 2025
Reproductive Freedom
Coalition Acts to Protect Pregnant Patients Federal Right to Emergency Care, Including Abortion
WASHINGTON Today, Doctors for America represented by Democracy Forward, the 勛圖眻畦, the 勛圖眻畦 of Tennessee, and the National Womens Law Center is taking legal action to defend pregnant patients' right to receive, and for physicians to provide, health- and life-saving abortion care under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA). This federal law has required hospitals with emergency departments to provide stabilizing treatment, including abortion, to patients experiencing medical emergencies for nearly four decades. Through its intervention, Doctors for America seeks to ensure that the right to emergency abortion care under EMTALA is vigorously defended. Doctors for Americas motion to intervene was filed in Catholic Medical Association v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al., which challenges EMTALA guidance issued in 2022, which reaffirms EMTALAs protections for pregnant people, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Nashville Division. Doctors should not be forced to choose between following the law and saving a patients life, said Dr. Christine Petrin, president of Doctors for America. EMTALA was designed to protect patients in crisis. We are fighting to ensure that these protections extend to pregnant patients and that physicians can provide lifesaving treatment to them without fear of prosecution. For nearly 40 years, EMTALA has been understood by medical providers and the federal government including both Democratic and Republican administrations to require abortion care when that care is needed to stabilize pregnant patients in a medical crisis. As todays motion to intervene emphasizes, stripping away EMTALAs protections would put doctors in legal chaos and force them to violate their sworn duty: to save lives and prevent harm. Pregnant people have suffered needlessly, and some have died, because of the chaos and confusion that abortion bans have caused for patients and their doctors, said Carrie Flaxman, senior legal advisor at Democracy Forward. EMTALA has protected the lives and health of pregnant people for nearly four decades it is a critical safeguard to ensure that pregnant people receive medical care in emergency situations, including abortion care. Any attempt to undermine EMTALA and its implementation which will sow confusion for providers and endanger the lives and health of pregnant people will be met swiftly with action by Democracy Forward, our partners, and our brave clients. When pregnant patients go to the emergency room, they expect to get the care needed to protect their health and lives but anti-abortion politicians and their allies would rather see women die than access abortion, said Alexa Kolbi-Molinas, deputy director of the 勛圖眻畦 Reproductive Freedom Project. It is shocking but not surprising that extremists continue pushing to make abortion completely inaccessible, even in emergencies. The 勛圖眻畦 and our partners will not stop fighting against these continued attacks on our reproductive freedom. We are taking action because lives are on the line, said Emily Martin, chief program officer at the National Womens Law Center. Every one of us expects that if we, or someone we love, face a medical emergency, a hospital will do what it takes to save us. But since the Supreme Court lawlessly overturned Roe v. Wade, anti-abortion extremists have wrought legal chaos. As a result, some pregnant patients facing life- and health-threatening emergencies havent been able to get the care they urgently need and are entitled to by law. Pregnant people have the right to access emergency care just like anyone else, including emergency abortion care. We will not allow these basic safeguards to be stripped away by extremists. The federal law requiring emergency care be provided to all has been saving lives for decades, and we refuse to let anti-abortion politicians put more pregnant people at risk of immense suffering or even death because they cant get the care they have the right to receive.Court Case: Catholic Medical Association v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al.Affiliate: Tennessee