Georgia Federal Court Temporarily Blocks Removal Under Alien Enemies Act
COLUMBUS, Ga. — A federal court in Georgia has temporarily blocked the Trump administration from using the Alien Enemies Act to deport a Venezuelan man who is seeking asylum and being held in the Stewart Detention Center in Georgia. The case is Y.A.P.A. v. Trump.
The ruling stems from a lawsuit brought by the Թֱ and the American Immigration Council.
The Georgia court is one of many around the country involving Թֱ lawsuits to have now blocked the Trump administration from using the Alien Enemies Act to send people to a notorious overseas prison without due process.
The following is reaction to the ruling:
Թֱ attorney Daniel Galindo, who argued the case, said: “The president can’t unilaterally declare an invasion of the United States to invoke a wartime authority during peacetime, and send a person off to a brutal El Salvador prison with zero due process. This decision provides important protection against illegal and unconstitutional acts by the government.”
The ruling is online here.

Immigrants' Rights
Y.A.P.A. v. Trump

Immigrants' Rights
Y.A.P.A. v. Trump
Learn More Թֱ the Issues in This Press Release
Related Content
-
Press ReleaseMay 2025
Immigrants' Rights
Federal Court Rules in Favor of U.S. Citizen Illegally Detained for Deportation by Florida Sheriff
MIAMI, Fla. — A federal court today granted a motion for partial summary judgment in Brown v. Ramsay, a federal lawsuit challenging the illegal detention of Peter Sean Brown, a U.S. citizen who was arrested and detained by the Monroe County, Fla. Sheriff’s Office (MSCO) at the request of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The court ruled that Mr. Brown’s Fourth Amendment rights were violated when Monroe County Sheriff Rick Ramsay illegally detained him in April 2018. Mr. Brown was held on an ICE immigration detainer, which had incorrectly identified Mr. Brown as a deportable Jamaican immigrant. The court’s ruling explains that ICE lacked probable cause to issue the detainer in the first place, and the Sheriff’s office could not rely on the detainer to ignore the obvious evidence that Mr. Brown was a citizen: “MCSO cannot abdicate its legal responsibility and turn a blind eye to this information.” ICE’s controversial “detainers” ask state and local law enforcement agencies to re-arrest and detain individuals identified by ICE for up to 48 hours after their state cases have ended. The ruling is a win for immigrants’ rights, demonstrating that – as advocates have long argued – ICE detainers are deeply flawed and local officials act at their own peril when they accept these documents to justify additional detention. Monroe County joins a long list of jurisdictions that have been held liable or settled claims arising from immigration detainer holds. The decision comes amid increasing reports that ICE has arrested, detained, and even deported U.S. citizens as ICE engages in mass deportations. State police have done the same; in Florida, SB 4-C – which makes it a felony for certain undocumented people to enter the state based solely on their immigration history – put U.S. citizens at further risk of arrest and deportation. Last month, a U.S. citizen was wrongfully arrested under the law by local law enforcement who suspected he was undocumented, underscoring the dangers of immigration enforcement by local authorities and causing a federal judge to reiterate that enforcement of the law is currently prohibited because it is likely unconstitutional. Quotes from co-counsel are as follows: “We have seen the ICE detainer system fail time and again, but the County still chose to put Mr. Brown through this nightmare,” said Cody Wofsy, deputy project director of the Թֱ’s Immigrants’ Rights Project. “At a moment in which we are seeing a raft of unlawful immigration arrests of citizens by federal and local authorities, this decision is a key reminder that the Fourth Amendment safeguards us all.” "This case highlights the significant threat posed to U.S. citizens by frequent ICE errors, which are exacerbated when local law enforcement agencies participate in immigration enforcement,” said Amien Kacou, staff attorney at the Թֱ of Florida. ““This case makes one thing clear: state and local police who act as ICE’s enforcers do so at their own peril. The Sheriff’s office cannot deflect responsibility onto ICE and ignore its independent duty to ensure there is probable cause before arresting someone like Mr. Brown. His perseverance in this lawsuit reaffirms that the U.S. Constitution protects every Floridian, regardless of citizenship." "We welcome the court’s ruling, which affirms that no person should be unlawfully detained based on flawed immigration enforcement practices,” said Sui Chung, executive director at Americans for Immigrant Justice. “Today’s decision brings long-overdue relief for Mr. Brown, whose unjust legal ordeal should never have happened. The court’s ruling is a strong reminder that law enforcement must uphold constitutional protections for all individuals, regardless of status."Court Case: Peter Sean Brown v. Richard RamsayAffiliate: Florida -
Press ReleaseMay 2025
Immigrants' Rights
Civil Rights Organizations Raise Alarm Over Conditions and Rights Violations at Immigrant Detention Facilities Run by Federal Agencies
LEAVENWORTH, Kan. / MIAMI – Civil rights organizations today called on the Trump administration to ensure that immigrants’ rights are upheld at the Federal Correctional Institution Leavenworth (FCI Leavenworth) and Federal Detention Center-Miami (FDC-Miami) following reports of frequent illegal and inhumane conditions. In letters to the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), advocates detail frequent and systemic failures, including lack of access to legal counsel, medical care, and conditions of confinement at the Kansas and Florida BOP facilities. Advocates’ letters come as the Senate is poised to vote on a reconciliation bill that would provide over $68 billion in taxpayer dollars to expand ICE detention. “The Trump administration’s use of federal prisons to detain immigrants must end. Holding people in extended lockdown, and denying them access to adequate medical care, legal counsel, and even sunlight isn’t just inhumane – it’s illegal,” said Eunice Cho, senior staff attorney at the Թֱ’s National Prison Project. “The taxpayer-funded conditions faced by immigrants held at FCI Leavenworth and FDC-Miami should concern us all.” In a letter to ICE and BOP regarding the conditions at FCI Leavenworth, advocates warn that in just two months, people detained at FCI Leavenworth have experienced a variety of inhumane and illegal conditions, including: Lengthy lockdowns, with some individuals reporting being held in their cells for more than 72 consecutive hours as a result of understaffing, as well as unsanitary conditions. Significant delays in receiving medical care, and when they are seen by staff for treatment, they are not provided with proper care and are instructed to pay for medication, which is in violation of ICE policy. Lack of language access, impacting detained individuals’ ability to seek adequate and timely medical care. Issues with access to telephones at the facility, hindering their ability to call their attorneys or loved ones. Significant mail delays, impacting detained individuals’ ability to prepare their legal cases, as well as receive and send timely legal mailings. Lack of religious services that are otherwise available to people in BOP custody at FCI Leavenworth, in violation of an agreement between ICE and BOP. The civil rights groups – which include the Advocates for Immigrant Rights and Reconciliation, the Թֱ, Թֱ of Kansans, American Immigration Lawyers’ Association, Federal Public Defender, District of Kansas, Missouri/Kansas Chapter of the American Immigration Lawyers’ Association, National Immigrant Justice Center, and the Office of Justice, Peace, and Integrity of Creation of the Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth Federal – also argue that the conditions at FCI Leavenworth fall well below what is required by the interagency agreement, BOP and ICE policy, and the Constitution. “Detaining someone and undermining their due process by blocking access to counsel is a clear and unequivocal violation of the Sixth Amendment,” said Michael Sharma-Crawford, a local immigration attorney and the current chair of the Kansas and Missouri chapter of the American Immigration Lawyers Association. “That injustice becomes even more severe when it targets civil detainees—people who are not accused of any crime. The harm in these cases is not just amplified; it is indefensible.” Meanwhile, at FDC-Miami, legal service providers have reported serious and pervasive failures to provide detained individuals access to legal documents and legal mail, severely limiting their ability to access and communicate with legal counsel, as well as their ability to apply for protection in the U.S. and to fight their cases in immigration court. Additionally, detained individuals face extreme obstacles in accessing phones to seek counsel and to make outgoing calls to their attorneys, especially during periods of confinement. In a letter sent by the Americans for Immigrant Justice, the Թֱ, Թֱ of Florida, and Florida Legal Services, advocates argue that these barriers violate due process protections guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment, as well as detained individuals’ First Amendment right to free speech, which includes the right to communicate confidentially with attorneys. “Denying detained immigrants access to legal documents, mail, and phone calls makes it all but impossible to fight and win an immigration case,” said Americans for Immigrant Justice Executive Director Sui Chung. “The systemic denial of due process at FDC-Miami has impacted immigrants who desperately seek refuge and are legally entitled to pursue relief in the United States. Americans for Immigrant Justice is committed to ensuring that immigrants detained at FDC-Miami receive the protections they are due under U.S. law and the U.S. Constitution.” Immigrants’ rights groups and medical experts have repeatedly called out ICE’s history of abuse, pervasive medical neglect, and disregard for the dignity of people in its custody. A June 2024 report from the Թֱ, Physicians for Human Rights, and American Oversight found that 95 percent of documented deaths in ICE custody between 2017-2021 were likely preventable. Despite this track record of abuse, ICE signaled plans to expand detention beyond its already staggering capacity of 146 facilities nationwide, despite strong public opposition from immigrants' rights advocates, the media, and members of Congress. Advocates’ letter regarding FCI Leavenworth is available here: /documents/advocacy-letter-re-ice-detention-at-fci-leavenworth Advocates’ letter regarding FDC-Miami is available here: /documents/advocacy-letter-re-ice-detention-at-fdc-miamiAffiliates: Kansas, Florida -
Press ReleaseMay 2025
Free Speech
Immigrants' Rights
Court Finds Trump’s Use of Obscure Immigration Law Provision to Detain Mahmoud Khalil Likely Unconstitutional
NEW YORK, NY – A federal court in New Jersey issued an opinion ruling that the foreign policy grounds on which Mahmoud Khalil was detained are likely unconstitutional. The court held that Khalil is likely to succeed on the merits of his unconstitutional vagueness argument. The court asked for additional information in order to rule further on his outstanding request for release from detention. Judge Michael E. Farbiarz noted that the foreign policy charges in Mahmoud’s case are “unprecedented” and likely unconstitutional, stating: “the issue now before the Court has been this: does the Constitution allow the Secretary of State to use Section 1227, as applied through the determination, to try to remove the Petitioner from the United States? The Court’s answer: likely not.” In response to the opinion, Mr. Khalil’s legal team vowed to fight on, stating: “The district court held what we already knew: Secretary Rubio's weaponization of immigration law to punish Mahmoud and others like him is likely unconstitutional. We will work as quickly as possible to provide the court the additional information it requested supporting our effort to free Mahmoud or otherwise return him to his wife and newborn son. Every day Mahmoud spends languishing in an ICE detention facility in Jena, Louisiana, is an affront to justice, and we won't stop working until he is free.” The legal team awaits a full and final ruling on the preliminary injunction motion, in addition to Mr. Khalil’s pending motions for release on bail and for him to be returned to New Jersey. In a broader warning, the judge wrote, “If Section 1227 can apply, here, to the Petitioner, then other, similar statutes can also one day be made to apply. Not just in the removal context, as to foreign nationals. But also in the criminal context, as to everyone.” On March 8, the Trump administration and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) illegally arrested and detained Mr. Khalil in direct retaliation for his advocacy for Palestinian rights at Columbia University. Shortly after, DHS transferred him 1,400 miles away to a Louisiana detention facility — ripping him away from his wife and legal counsel. Since being unlawfully detained, Mr. Khalil has been forced to miss the birth of his first child and other irreplaceable moments in his family's life. Mr. Khalil is represented by Dratel & Lewis, the Center for Constitutional Rights, CLEAR, Van Der Hout LLP, Washington Square Legal Services, the New York Civil Liberties Union, the Թֱ of New Jersey, and the Թֱ.Court Case: Khalil v. TrumpAffiliates: New York, New Jersey -
News & CommentaryMay 2025
Immigrants' Rights
Human Rights
George Takei: How the Alien Enemies Act Paved the Way for the Incarceration of My Family
The actor and writer shares with the Թֱ why he fears that, in Trump's America, history is repeating itself.By: George Takei