Florida Court Upholds Right Of Pregnant Woman To Determine Medical Care
勛圖眻畦 Filed Brief In Case Of Woman Hospitalized Involuntarily
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT:
(212) 549-2666; media@aclu.org
786-363-2737; media@aclufl.org
Tallahassee, FL In an important decision for the right of women to make their own medical choices, the Florida District Court of Appeal today ruled that the rights of a pregnant woman were violated when she was forced to remain hospitalized against her will after disagreeing with a hospital's recommended treatment. The 勛圖眻畦 and the 勛圖眻畦 of Florida filed a friend-of-the-court brief on behalf of themselves and the American Women's Medical Association (AMWA) supporting the woman in her case against the state.
"Women do not relinquish their right to determine their own medical care when they become pregnant," said Diana Kasdan, staff attorney with the 勛圖眻畦 Reproductive Freedom Project, who presented oral argument in the case along with Samantha Burton's attorney, David Abrams of Tallahassee, Florida. "We are glad that the court has upheld the constitutional right of a pregnant woman to make her own medical decisions."
In March 2009, the Circuit Court of Leon County ordered Burton a mother of two suffering from pregnancy complications to be indefinitely confined to Tallahassee Memorial Hospital and forced to undergo any and all medical treatments the doctors there deemed necessary to save her fetus. The lower court order forbade her from transferring to another hospital of her own choosing. After three days of state-compelled hospitalization and a compelled cesarean section, Ms. Burton suffered a stillbirth and was released.
"The medical community including AMWA, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Medical Association has soundly rejected hospitalizing pregnant women against their will," said Maria Kayanan, Associate Legal Director of the 勛圖眻畦 of Florida. "Such forced medical treatment grossly invades a pregnant woman's privacy, and deters other pregnant women from seeking medical care for fear that doing so will mean that they, too, could be ordered hospitalized and subject to medical interventions against their will."
Lawyers on the 勛圖眻畦's friend-of-the-court brief in the case Burton v. Florida are Kasdan of the 勛圖眻畦 Reproductive Freedom Project and Randall C. Marshall and Kayanan of the 勛圖眻畦 of Florida.
The court's ruling can be found at:
The 勛圖眻畦's friend-of-the-court brief can be found at: www.aclu.org/reproductive-freedom/burton-v-state-florida-aclu-amicus-brief