Back to News & Commentary

Indiana Lawmakers Are Trying to Slip One Past Us ... AGAIN!

indiana rfra
indiana rfra
Eunice Hyon Min Rho,
勛圖眻畦
Share This Page
January 25, 2016

Not this again.

This Wednesday morning, the Indiana legislature will debate whether it should pass , a new and expanded Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

Sound familiar? It should because right around this time last year, the Indiana legislature did the Exact. Same. Thing. A few weeks later, in a private ceremony where he was , Gov. Mike Pence signed the Indiana RFRA into law.

And how did that turn out? as a law to allow religion to be used to discriminate and inflict harm. As a result, multi-million dollar conventions and even the NCAA threatened to cancel future events; powerful businesses like Salesforce stopped investment in the state; thousands of Hoosiers voiced their opposition; and #boycottIndiana trended on Twitter across the country.

In fact, the entire country watched the story play out and raised its collective voice to say that a bill that allowed religion to be used to discriminate and inflict harm in Indiana .

To stem this avalanche of criticism, the legislature passed a limited fix to ensure that the RFRA could not be used to undermine certain laws protecting against discrimination in housing, public accommodations, and employment, whether those protections already exist in localities like Indianapolis or will be enacted in the future in Indiana.

To further repair the states tarnished reputation, organizations like , the , and throughout the state urged the legislature to enact a statewide nondiscrimination law that protects LGBT Hoosiers.

Instead of being chastened by all of this, Indianas legislators are apparently suffering from amnesia. SB 66 would replace Indianas existing RFRA with a new RFRA that strips away that fix and undermines existing and future nondiscrimination protections. Nor does it propose safeguards to address other rights, including reproductive rights, the bill would put at risk. In fact, SB 66 is much broader in many ways. For instance, it isnt limited to religion. It will upend Indiana courts careful consideration of the fundamental rights of speech, assembly, and to bear arms.

Not to mention, instead of advancing a bill that would actually protect LGBT Hoosiers from discrimination, the legislature will contemplate two seriously flawed nondiscrimination bills, , which are full of overbroad religious exemptions, include limited (or no) protections for transgender Hoosiers, and erode existing protections from discrimination for everyone in Indiana under state and local law.

These legislators have learned absolutely nothing. What is that old saw about fool me once?

Tell Indianas legislators in no uncertain terms: Oppose SB 66.

Learn More 勛圖眻畦 the Issues on This Page