The 勛圖眻畦 of Pennsylvania's Legal Director Witold "Vic" Walczak is a legal superstar. In fact, he was acknowledged as such last night by the Thomas Merton Center, where of protestors during the G20 summit in Pittsburgh last year.

At last night's event at the East Liberty Presbyterian Church, Vic also gave attendees a preview of some forthcoming litigation involving the actions of Pittsburgh police during the "Oakland sweeps," which occurred the night the summit closed. During the sweeps, police tear gassed and fired rubber bullets into a crowd of hundreds of protestors, students and passersby. The lawsuit will focus on some of the more than 80 arrestees from that night some were arrested without probable cause, others were arrested in violation of their First Amendment rights.
Vic blogged about the 勛圖眻畦 of Pennsylvania's work on behalf of G20 protestors last year. Writing in "Giving the First Amendment a Beating at the G20":
Pittsburghs use of harassment, intimidation, trickery, and indiscriminate arrests against demonstrators was fairly typical of the recent handling of other large important gatherings at the hands of various groups of law enforcement officials. At times when the imperative to allow freedom of speech and assembly is greatest when national and international leaders convene we impose martial law. Surely a more balanced model that provides security and respects civil liberties is possible.
Aside from this forthcoming case, Vic's other greatest hits include his challenge to the intelligent design curriculum in public schools, fighting the anti-immigrant ordinance in Hazelton, and the sexting case against former Wyoming County district attorney George Skumanick.
Learn More 勛圖眻畦 the Issues on This Page
Related Content
-
Press ReleaseMay 2025
Free Speech
National Security
勛圖眻畦 Urges House Committee to Remove Dangerous Anti-Dissent Provision from Tax Bill
WASHINGTON In an apparent effort to aid President Trumps discriminatory clamp down on free speech, Republicans on the House Ways & Means Committee have snuck a dangerous anti-dissent bill into their massive, new tax package. This provision, formerly known as H.R. 9495, would grant the executive branch the power to effectively shut down any non-profit organization including news outlets, universities, and civil liberties groups by accusing them of supporting terrorism and using that accusation to suspend their tax-exempt status without any real due process. It was defeated last year, yet extreme politicians are now trying to resurrect it once again. Mark-up of the tax bill will begin in the House Ways & Means Committee at 2:30 p.m. ET today. The following is a statement from Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel with the 勛圖眻畦: We've already seen the Trump administration falsely conflate students protesting in support of Palestinian rights with Hamas, deport immigrants to an El Salvadorian prison without due process, and detain students thousands of miles away from their loved ones for criticizing U.S. foreign policy. It is not a stretch to imagine how this bill could be used to pressure universities to shut down student groups, scare human rights organizations away from working with vulnerable communities, and further stifle dissent in this country. The Ways & Means Committee must strip this provision from the tax bill before it heads to the floor. -
Press ReleaseMay 2025
Free Speech
Immigrants' Rights
Mahmoud Khalil to Appear in Louisiana Immigration Court on May 22
WHAT: One day after the Columbia University commencement ceremony where Mahmoud Khalil was supposed to be walking with his peers, Mr. Khalil will instead be attending his immigration court hearing in Jena, LA. Virtual access is not guaranteed, but there are approximately 20 seats in the courtroom. Mr. Khalils legal team has requested the court grant either virtual or in-person access to interested press and public who wish to view these proceedings. The immigration court judge has not ruled on the motion. Following the hearing, his lawyers will be available for questions. WHEN: Thursday, May 22 (Exact timing yet to be announced) WHERE: Central Louisiana ICE Processing Center (830 Pine Hill Road, Jena, Louisiana) BACKGROUND: On March 8, the Trump administration and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) illegally arrested and detained Mr. Khalil in direct retaliation for his advocacy for Palestinian human rights at Columbia University. Shortly after, DHS transferred him 1400 miles away to a Louisiana detention facility ripping him away from his wife and legal counsel. While stuck in detention, he was forced to miss the birth of his first child. It later came out that they did not have a warrant. At his last immigration hearing in April, in what appeared to be a pre-written decision, a judge ruled that Mr. Khalil was removable under U.S. immigration law despite a lack of evidence. In May, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jerseys decision that Khalils case should be heard in New Jersey, where he was located when his habeas petition was filed. A decision on bail is outstanding.Court Case: Khalil v. TrumpAffiliates: New York, New Jersey -
Press ReleaseMay 2025
Free Speech
Immigrants' Rights
R羹meysa zt羹rk To Be Freed From Detention as Case Proceeds
BURLINGTON, Vt. A federal court today ordered the release of R羹meysa zt羹rk, a former Fulbright scholar and current Tufts University Ph.D. student researching child development. This comes more than six weeks after the Trump administration arrested and detained her because of an op-ed she co-authored in The Tufts Daily. With this ruling, she will be able to return to her Massachusetts community and continue her studies while the case proceeds. I am relieved and ecstatic that R羹meysa has been ordered released. Unfortunately, it is 45 days too late. She has been imprisoned all these days for simply writing an op-ed that called for human rights and dignity for the people in Palestine. When did speaking up against oppression become a crime? When did speaking up against genocide become something to be imprisoned for? said Mahsa Khanbabai of Khanbabai Immigration Law. I am thankful that the courts have been ruling in favor of detained political prisoners like R羹meysa. The public plays an important role in upholding our constitutional rights. Please continue to speak up for democracy and civil rights in every space including our elected offices, our universities, and our halls of justice. Ms. zt羹rk, who has not been accused of any crime, was taken by plainclothes ICE agents in Somerville, Massachusetts on March 25. For nearly 24 hours, Ms. zt羹rks attorney was unable to locate her as ICE quickly and quietly moved her to three separate locations in three different states including Vermont before sending her to Louisiana. From the moment a swarm of ICE agents abducted Ms. zt羹rk in broad daylight, the government has spared no effort to evade accountability and deny her due process. Today, the court delivered reprieve and justice for Ms. zt羹rk, who should not have spent even one minute incarcerated, let alone the six weeks she has endured in deplorable conditions at an ICE detention center in Louisiana, said Mudassar Toppa, staff attorney at CLEAR, a legal non-profit and clinic at CUNY School of Law. Make no mistake, the government tried to punish Ms. zt羹rk for lending her pen to advocacy for Palestinian human rights and the court's decision today is not only a victory for Ms. zt羹rk, but everyone who wishes to advocate for Palestinian human rights without fear of retaliation. We look forward to continuing the legal fight to vindicate all of her constitutional rights. Ms. zt羹rk has detailed her harrowing night being shuttled across New England with little food after a day of fasting for Ramadan. She describes being shackled by her feet and stomach and then driven to different sites for meetings with unidentified men, some in uniform and some not. One group so unsettled her, Ms. zt羹rk wrote, that she was sure they were going to kill me. At another stop, she repeatedly asked an officer if she was in physical danger. For 45 days, R羹meysa has been detained in Louisiana over 1300 miles from her friends, her community, and her lawyers. During that time, she has suffered regular and escalating asthma attacks. And at the same time, the government has failed to produce any justification for her detention, said Jessie Rossman, legal director at the 勛圖眻畦 of Massachusetts. We are so relieved that R羹meysa will soon be back in Massachusetts, and wont stop fighting until she is free for good. Ms. zt羹rk has suffered six weeks of crowded confinement in Louisiana with hardly any access to fresh air and in conditions that doctors say risk exacerbating her asthma attacks. Whereas her attacks used to last between 5 - 15 minutes, they now can last up to 45 minutes. Recent court filings also describe difficulty receiving appropriate care in detention, including delays to receive medical care and dismissive comments from medical staff. Since the government arrested Ms. zt羹rk, her community at Tufts and around the country have rallied around her. Hundreds of friends, colleagues, and professors, including the president of Tufts University, have sent letters of support to the court detailing Ms. zt羹rks dedication to her work and her community. R羹meysa can now return to her beloved Tufts community, resume her studies, and begin teaching again. We could not be more delighted, said Noor Zafar, senior staff attorney with 勛圖眻畦. Todays ruling underscores a vital First Amendment principle: No one should be imprisoned by the government for expressing their beliefs. After todays ruling, R羹meysa can return to her community at Tufts and sleep safely in her own bed. Tomorrow, she can wake up and begin the process of healing from this experience while she finishes her Ph.D. in child development. said Monica Allard, staff attorney with the 勛圖眻畦 of Vermont. Spending over six weeks in detention for writing an op-ed is a constitutional horror story. Her release is a victory for everyone committed to justice, free speech, and basic human rights. The government sent masked, plainclothes agents to kidnap R羹meysa off the street and lock her up for writing an op-ed. She has been a political prisoner for six weeks, said Sonya Levitova, associate at Emery Celli Brinckerhoff Abady Ward & Maazel LLP. Now that shes free and can resume her studies and rejoin her community at Tufts, we look forward to seeing the government in court to vindicate R羹meysas rights in full. Ms. zt羹rk is represented by Mahsa Khanbabai, the 勛圖眻畦, 勛圖眻畦 of Massachusetts, 勛圖眻畦 of Vermont, CLEAR, and Emery Celli Brinckerhoff Abady Ward & Maazel LLP. For documents and other case information, see here.Court Case: zt羹rk v. TrumpAffiliates: Vermont, Massachusetts -
Press ReleaseMay 2025
Free Speech
Religious Liberty
勛圖眻畦 Moves to Dismiss Lawsuit That Seeks to Punish Non-Profit Advocacy against Religious Activities in Oklahoma Schools
OKLAHOMA CITY Today, the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) filed a motion to dismiss a lawsuit against it by the Oklahoma State Department of Education (OSDE). FFRF sent letters to public schools in Oklahoma objecting to religious activities, prompting State Superintendent Ryan Walters and the Oklahoma Department of Education to file a SLAPP suit seeking to punish its constitutionally protected speech. The states Department of Education has failed to identify any actual violation of law. We are proud of the work we are doing to protect the rights of conscience of public school children in Oklahoma, said Annie Laurie Gaylor, FFRF co-president. This frivolous lawsuit by Ryan Walters seeks to silence FFRF, and we are not going to allow that to happen. FFRF is represented by the 勛圖眻畦 and the 勛圖眻畦 of Oklahoma. This Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP) seeks to chill the free speech and petition rights of FFRF. SLAPP suits are used to weaponize the legal system to punish and silence constitutionally protected speech. Advocacy organizations have the right to criticize government policy and push for change, said Megan Lambert, legal director of the 勛圖眻畦 of Oklahoma. This lawsuit is just another in a long line of political stunts by OSDE as it seeks to silence and punish dissent. We will vigorously defend FFRFs First Amendment rights against the Departments abuse of the legal process. Our client has not violated any law by speaking out against religious activities in Oklahoma public schools, said Vera Eidelman, senior staff attorney with the 勛圖眻畦s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. This lawsuit has one goal: to chill our clients ability to petition the government. This is an abusive legal tactic intended to punish people and organizations for speaking out and fighting back against government policies. The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma. The motion can be viewed online here.Court Case: Oklahoma State Department of Education v. Freedom From Religion FoundationAffiliate: Oklahoma