Back to News & Commentary

The Trump Administration is Banning Books on Military Bases. We Sued.

A mother in a military uniform reading to her daughter.
Censorship in Defense Department K-12 schools violates the First Amendment.
A mother in a military uniform reading to her daughter.
Sam LaFrance,
Communications Strategist, First Amendment
Share This Page
June 6, 2025

On military bases across the globe, books are disappearing from shelves. Posters of historical figures, like Frida Kahlo, are being removed from walls. Black History Month celebrations are being cancelled.

This rampant censorship is the result of the Department of Defenses new policies banning books, classroom discussions, events, and extracurriculars that relate to race and gender in military-run schools on bases around the world.

At the 勛圖眻畦, we know that all students deserve access to a diverse education and, the DODs efforts to strip them of this right violates the First Amendment. So we took the DOD to court.

Does the Department of Defense Have the Authority to Ban Books?

The U.S. Department of Defense runs public schools on military bases around the world for children of active-duty servicemembers and civilian military personnel. The agency that runs these schools is called the Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA), and it operates just like any other public school district -- except that it is run by the federal government and therefore is under the direct control of the secretary of defense and the commander in chief. DoDEA serves more than 67,000 students from kindergarten through high school in 161 schools across 11 countries, seven states, Guam, and Puerto Rico.

Compared to more traditional school districts in the U.S., DoDEA is among the most diverse, and most high achieving, in the nation.

But in January 2025, President Donald Trump signed three executive orders that impact DoDEA and how it operates:

  • titled Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government;
  • titled Restoring Americas Fighting Force; and
  • titled Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling

These executive orders prohibit, among other things, the use of federal funds for anything that may promote gender ideology or divisive concepts, the latter of which has long been interpreted to cover a wide array of topics related to race, sex, and history. EO 14185 explicitly instructs the military to stop promoting, advancing or otherwise inculcating several un-American, divisive, discriminatory, radical, extremist, and irrational theories -- all of which implicate books and curricula that relate to race and gender, as we have seen in public schools around the country since 2021. In President Trumps , these concepts add up to wokeness and must be removed from schools and the military: Wokeness is trouble, wokeness is bad, its gone. Its gone. And we feel so much better for it, dont we? Dont we feel better? Trump said.

How Are These Orders Being Implemented?

In February, DoDEA began implementing these new executive orders. In several emails to teachers and staff, administrators asked that they ensure books potentially related to gender ideology or discriminatory equity ideology are removed from the student section of the library. Parents were told that books potentially related to gender ideology or discriminatory equity ideology topics were to be relocated to a private section, away from students, for professional review. In an official, DOD-wide memo from January titled Identity Months Dead at DoD, the agency instructed all schools to cancel any special activities and non-instructional events related to Black History Month, Womens History Month, Pride Month, and more.

A news outlet in Kentucky that librarians at Fort Campbell felt they needed to remove any books that mention slavery, the civil rights movement or the treatment of Native Americans. In that same school, an internal memo explicitly banned monthly cultural observances -- resulting in bulletin boards about Black history being taken down, and the cancellation of similar plans for Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month.

Several books and resources were removed from the curriculum, including chapters of two AP Psychology books that discussed human sexuality and a historically accurate, grade-appropriate biography of Robert Cashier, a civil war veteran who was born female but enlisted and fought valiantly as a man in the Union Army. This censorship extended into sex education, too. Several chapters were banned from DoDEA sex ed textbooks, including on communicable diseases, abuse, sexual harassment, and puberty.

The agency left no stone unturned. Even school yearbooks were implicated: no visual depictions, written content, or editorial choices that may indicate support for social transition was allowed.

According to DoDEA itself, 555 books and 41 curricular materials were removed from schools for review. The court recently ordered them to disclose what they were, but while confirmation is pending, we have compiled a list of 233 titles that were allegedly banned using news reporting, declarations from plaintiffs, and official documentation from DoDEA. This includes books like Freckleface Strawberry by Julianne Moore, To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, and Juli獺n Is a Mermaid by Jessica Love, and hundreds more.

DoDEA has refused to confirm which books are officially on the chopping block systemwide, despite pleas from parents, students, and advocates. As with other school districts, the vast majority of books allegedly banned within DoDEA are by or about women, LGBTQ people, and people of color.

How Does This Restrict Our Rights?

This is a direct violation of the First Amendment. Students in DoDEA schools, just like other students in American public schools, have a right to receive information about the world around them. They have a right to read books about their own experiences or the experiences of people that are different from them, and they have a right to have their education shaped not by animus or politics but by pedagogical expertise, curiosity, and educational rigor.

The 勛圖眻畦, along with the 勛圖眻畦 of Kentucky and the 勛圖眻畦 of Virginia, filed suit against DoDEA in March on behalf of six families with children in DoDEA schools. These families have children ranging from kindergarten to 11th grade in schools around the world.

Were arguing that the removals and bans are not based on rational, age-appropriate, evidence-based concerns but on politics, and the presidents anti-wokeness agenda. This limits students ability to think critically, learn about themselves and their neighbors, and in the case of sex ed materials, even keep themselves safe from harm. On Tuesday, the 勛圖眻畦 argued in the Eastern District of Virginia that the court should grant an immediate preliminary injunction to restore curriculum, put books back on the shelf, and prevent DoDEA from continuing to enforce the executive orders that caused all of this.

How Are Communities Fighting Back?

This battle wont just be won in the courtroom student organizers in DoDEA schools have been leading walkouts in protest of these new policies, often risking disciplinary action, since January. In South Korea, 40 students participated in one such walkout, which included a flag folding ceremony and a student dressed as the Statue of Liberty. Military parents, like the ones bringing the lawsuit, have spoken out about how incongruous this spate of censorship is with their jobs: We make sacrifices as a military family so that my husband can defend the Constitution and the rights and freedoms of all Americans, said one such parent.

If our own rights and the rights of our children are at risk, we have a responsibility to speak out.

This is an excerpt of a piece originally published by .

Learn More 勛圖眻畦 the Issues on This Page