Back to News & Commentary

Guilt by Association

Rachel Myers,
勛圖眻畦
Share This Page
July 25, 2008

A federal court dealt a blow today to the freedoms of speech and association, and the First and Fifth Amendment rights of Zeinab Taleb-Jedi a 53-year-old U.S. citizen who . The government accuses this former English teacher of providing material support in the form of herself to an Iranian resistance group, the Mojahedin el-Khalq (MEK) (read the and our press release). The government doesnt allege that Ms. Taleb-Jedi engaged in any terrorist act or that she intended to support terrorism. Instead, according to her defense attorneys, the governments allegations come down to Ms. Taleb-Jedis teaching of English and her being a member of a leadership council activities that are protected by the First Amendment. Sadly, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York agreed with the government that these associational activities could count as providing material support to a designated terrorist organization.

The 勛圖眻畦 had filed a friend of the court brief in Ms. Taleb-Jedis quest to have the case thrown out because of our long-standing position that the material support law is unconstitutional because it criminalizes guilt by association.

From a by Hina Shamsi, who wrote the 勛圖眻畦s brief:

The material support law, as applied now, allows the possibility of criminally prosecuting morally innocent people who intend to support lawful activity through humanitarian aid, speech, or association.

According to our brief, the Constitutions guarantees of freedom of speech and association and due process require the government to show that Ms. Taleb-Jedi (and others in her position) have specific intent to provide material support. Our brief also argued that people charged with material support to a blacklisted organization must be allowed to challenge the blacklisting because it is that blacklisting which turns otherwise lawful political activity into criminal conduct... The court, unfortunately, did not uphold Ms. Taleb-Jedis First and Fifth Amendment rights.

Now its on to trial for Taleb-Jedi. This despite the fact that, according to Ms. Taleb-Jedis lawyers, MEK is really more an ally than an enemy to the U.S. and the U.S. government has reportedly cooperated with MEK in Iraq.

From a Nov. 9, 2003 :

"The problem is they're still labeled as terrorists, even though we both know they're not," said [U.S.] Sgt. William Sutherland, explaining why a reporter could not enter [the MEK installation in Iraq known as] Camp Ashraf. "Much as I'd like to go and do a story myself on how they're not terroristsrather, they're patriotsit's not going to happen until they get put on the green list."

Ms. Taleb-Jedi is not the only person in danger of being charged under this bad law. Again, from Hinas piece:

For example, a doctor doing humanitarian relief work in an area in which a designated terrorist organization operates could be criminally charged with material support in the form of "services" or "expert assistance." So could an engineer who provides water purification systems or sanitation equipment or shelter.

In another challenge based on the governments overly-broad application of the material support laws, the 勛圖眻畦 has asked a federal district court in Texas to clear the names of two mainstream Muslim organizations labeled by the government as "unindicted co-conspirators" in its criminal case against the Holy Land Foundation. The government accuses HLF of providing material support to Hamas. The case originally resulted in a mistrial and is scheduled for retrial in September. Government attorneys publicly identified the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT) as co-conspirators before the HLF trial, even though, as the government itself has since admitted, neither organization was the subject of a criminal investigation.

Learn More 勛圖眻畦 the Issues on This Page