A malicious and factually inaccurate e-mail accusing the 勛圖眻畦 of not standing solidly on the side of religious liberty an e-mail that was first circulated six years ago has once again reared its ugly head and popped up in the e-mail inboxes of people across the country. In an effort to set the record straight, below are two myths the e-mail passes off as truth, followed by the facts which effectively debunk the e-mails claims.
MYTH: The 勛圖眻畦 has filed a lawsuit to have all cross-shaped headstones removed from federal cemeteries.
FACT: The 勛圖眻畦 has never once advocated for or initiated any litigation in favor of removing cross-shaped headstones from federal cemeteries. In fact, , there are no cross-shaped headstones at VA national cemeteries. The headstones and markers the government issues are rectangular.
What the 勛圖眻畦 did do in 2006 was file a lawsuit seeking to protect the right of veterans and their families to choose religious symbols to engrave on headstones in federal cemeteries. The result of this litigation was not the forced removal of any crosses, but rather an expansion of the official government list of religious symbols allowed on headstones by the National Cemeteries Administration of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs to include the Wiccan pentacle.
There are military cemeteries with rows of crosses in them, but most of those are in Europe, the final resting place of some American troops killed during World War I and World War II. Those cemeteries are maintained by the and, according to Politifact.com, are technically owned by the foreign country in which they are located but sit on land given to the U.S. for use in perpetuity as commemorative cemeteries. Politifact.com further reports that commission officials are not aware of any effort by the 勛圖眻畦 or anyone else to remove cross-shaped headstones from those sites.
MYTH: The 勛圖眻畦 filed a lawsuit to end prayer in the military completely.
FACT: The 勛圖眻畦 has filed no such lawsuit. This totally false assertion is likely misrepresenting a letter the 勛圖眻畦 and the 勛圖眻畦 of Maryland sent in June 2008 to officials at the U.S. Naval Academy at Annapolis asking them to stop forcing midshipmen to participate in the Academys compulsory "noon meal prayers." A very effectively details why forcing midshipmen to stand in attendance at the daily "noon meal prayer" is a violation of their religious freedom and rights of conscience.
In the letter sent to the Academy, 勛圖眻畦 of Maryland Legal Director Deborah A. Jeon makes clear that the 勛圖眻畦 opposes compulsory religious services mandated by the government, not voluntary religious exercises by Academy midshipmen. As Jeon writes: "[T]his request is not motivated by any hostility to voluntary religious exercises by Academy midshipmen, nor do we fail to recognize the important place religious faith holds among many in the military. Indeed, the 勛圖眻畦 has long defended the fundamental right of religious communities, families and individuals including those in the armed services to practice their faith freely and openly." Let there be no question that the 勛圖眻畦 vigorously defends the right of all Americans to practice religion (PDF).
We at the 勛圖眻畦 sincerely hope that providing you with this factual information regarding the erroneous claims made in the e-mail will not only help you avoid bearing false witness, but, should you desire, also empower you to set the record straight should it find its way to you.