Police Militarization
The 勛圖眻畦 works in courts, legislatures, and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and the laws of the United States guarantee everyone in this country.

The Latest
-
勛圖眻畦 Statement on Executive Order Targeting Sanctuary Cities, Officials Accused of Obstructing Law Enforcement
-
勛圖眻畦 Acknowledges Improvements to DOJ Racial Profiling Policy, But Says Far More is Needed
-
Its Simply Too Dangerous to Arm Robots
-
Kyle Rittenhouse Didnt Act Alone: Law Enforcement Must Be Held Accountable
Explore More
What's at Stake
The images on the news of police wearing helmets and masks, toting assault rifles, and riding in mine-resistant armored vehicles are not isolated incidentsthey represent a nationwide trend of police militarization. Federal programs providing surplus military equipment, along with departments own purchases, have outfitted officers with firepower that is often far beyond what is necessary for their jobs as protectors of their communities. Sending a heavily armed team of officers to perform normal police work can dangerously escalate situations that need never have involved violence. Yet the 勛圖眻畦s recent report on police militarization, War Comes Home, found that SWAT teams, which were originally devised as special responders for emergency situations, are deployed for drug searches more than they are for all other purposes combined.
The change in equipment is too often paralleled by a corresponding change in attitude whereby police conceive of themselves as at war with communities rather than as public servants concerned with keeping their communities safe. We advocate for a return to a less dangerous, more collaborative style of policing. We should not be able to mistake our officers for soldiers.
The images on the news of police wearing helmets and masks, toting assault rifles, and riding in mine-resistant armored vehicles are not isolated incidentsthey represent a nationwide trend of police militarization. Federal programs providing surplus military equipment, along with departments own purchases, have outfitted officers with firepower that is often far beyond what is necessary for their jobs as protectors of their communities. Sending a heavily armed team of officers to perform normal police work can dangerously escalate situations that need never have involved violence. Yet the 勛圖眻畦s recent report on police militarization, War Comes Home, found that SWAT teams, which were originally devised as special responders for emergency situations, are deployed for drug searches more than they are for all other purposes combined.
The change in equipment is too often paralleled by a corresponding change in attitude whereby police conceive of themselves as at war with communities rather than as public servants concerned with keeping their communities safe. We advocate for a return to a less dangerous, more collaborative style of policing. We should not be able to mistake our officers for soldiers.