吃瓜直播

WASHINGTON 鈥� The 吃瓜直播, the 吃瓜直播 of the District of Columbia, the First Liberty Institute, and the law firm of Steptoe, LLP, today challenged the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority鈥檚 (WMATA) advertising restrictions as violations of the First Amendment. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of WallBuilders Presentations (鈥淲allBuilders鈥�), an organization advocating for Americans to understand their history and the important role religion played in the founding of our nation, which sought to advertise on the side of WMATA Metro buses. WMATA rejected the ads on the ground that they violated its advertising guidelines, which prohibit advertising 鈥渋ntended to influence members of the public regarding an issue on which there are varying public opinions.鈥� It is also apparent that WallBuilders鈥� ads violated the guidelines鈥� prohibition on advertisements 鈥渢hat promote or oppose any religion, religious practice, or belief.鈥� The lawsuit argues that these ad guidelines violate the First Amendment, which prohibits government agencies from discriminating against private speech based on their viewpoint or from imposing rules that aren鈥檛 applied consistently. The lawsuit provides many examples of ads about controversial issues that WMATA has accepted, such as recent ads demanding Supreme Court term limits along with ads demanding transparency in hospital prices. WMATA has also accepted ads with religious content, such as an ad for The Book of Mormon musical, which harshly lampoons the Mormon Church and religion in general. The lawsuit shows how the guidelines inevitably lead to discrimination based on advertisers鈥� viewpoints and are necessarily applied in an arbitrary and unreasonable manner. This free speech lawsuit is the second filed by the 吃瓜直播 that challenges WMATA鈥檚 advertising guidelines. The 2017 lawsuit, 吃瓜直播 et al. v. WMATA, documents how WMATA has discriminated against a variety of viewpoints, including an abortion pill ad from the women鈥檚 health care collective Carafem, an 吃瓜直播 ad seeking to display the text of the First Amendment in several languages, an ad for Milo Worldwide LLC (the company of conservative commentator and writer Milo Yiannopoulos), and an ad by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. 吃瓜直播 et al. v. WMATA is still pending, and information on the lawsuit may be found here. 鈥淭he case against WMATA is a critical reminder of what鈥檚 at stake when government entities exercise selective censorship. The First Amendment doesn鈥檛 play favorites; it ensures that all voices, regardless of their message, have the right to be heard,鈥� said Arthur Spitzer, senior counsel at the 吃瓜直播-D.C. 鈥淭he 吃瓜直播 defends these suits, regardless of whether it agrees with the underlying message, because it believes in the speaker鈥檚 right to express it. The government cannot arbitrarily decide which voices to silence in public forums.鈥� 鈥淭he First Amendment grants all Americans the right to express their point of view, religious or secular,鈥� said First Liberty Senior Counsel Jeremy Dys. 鈥淩ejecting a faith-based advertising banner by labeling it an 鈥榠ssue ad,鈥� while accepting other ads such as those promoting a 鈥楽ocial Justice School,鈥� 鈥楨arth Day,鈥� and the highly controversial idea of terms limits for Supreme Court justices, is clearly hypocritical, discriminatory, and illegal. WMATA must support the freedoms provided in the First Amendment rather than silence Americans through censorship.鈥� The lawsuit asks the court to declare the WMATA guidelines prohibiting 鈥渋ssue ads鈥� and ads with religious content unconstitutional and to order WMATA to accept and run the WallBuilders advertisements it had rejected and others that would violate these guidelines.   The complaint in today鈥檚 case, WallBuilders v. WMATA, may be found here. The rejected ads can be viewed here.