Georgia
Eternal Vigilance Action, Inc. v. Georgia
The 勛圖眻畦 and partner organizations have sought to intervene in this case to represent the rights of voters and voting-rights organizations in a case challenging a number of rules passed by the Georgia State Election Board. We challenge a rule that requires that the number of votes cast be hand counted at the polling place prior to the tabulation of votes. This rule risks delay and spoliation of ballots, putting in danger voters rights to have their votes count.
Status: Ongoing
View Case
Featured
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2023

Criminal Law Reform
McElrath v. Georgia
Does the Double Jeopardy Clause bar an appellate court from reviewing and setting aside a jurys verdicts of acquittal on the ground that the verdict is inconsistent with the jurys verdict on other charges?
Georgia
Jun 2020

Disability Rights
Harris v. Georgia Department of Corrections
On October 3, 2018, the 勛圖眻畦 and the 勛圖眻畦 of Georgia, together with National Association of the Deaf and Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of deaf and hard of hearing people incarcerated in prisons supervised by the Georgia Department of Corrections (GDC). The complaint highlights GDCs failure to provide incarcerated deaf and hard of hearing people with equally effective communication access to programs, services, and activities, including medical care, telecommunications, and prison programs. Further, due to lack of access to interpreters and other communication accommodations, deaf prisoners are also often unable to explain or defend themselves when GDC takes disciplinary action against them.
All Cases
26 Georgia Cases

Georgia
May 2025
Criminal Law Reform
Smart Justice
Coronell, et al. v. Georgia
As a result of Georgia Senate Bill 63, thousands of people are being kept in jail pre-trial because they cant afford to post bail, even when a judge believes the person should have been released until trial with no risk to the public. The 勛圖眻畦s Criminal Law Reform Project, along with 勛圖眻畦-GA and the Southern Center for Human Rights, filed a class action lawsuit challenging SB63s mandatory monetary bail provisions under the Georgia State Constitution.
Explore case
Georgia
May 2025

Criminal Law Reform
Smart Justice
Coronell, et al. v. Georgia
As a result of Georgia Senate Bill 63, thousands of people are being kept in jail pre-trial because they cant afford to post bail, even when a judge believes the person should have been released until trial with no risk to the public. The 勛圖眻畦s Criminal Law Reform Project, along with 勛圖眻畦-GA and the Southern Center for Human Rights, filed a class action lawsuit challenging SB63s mandatory monetary bail provisions under the Georgia State Constitution.

Georgia
Apr 2025
Immigrants' Rights
Y.A.P.A. v. Trump
Emergency lawsuit filed in federal court to again halt removals under the Alien Enemies Act for people within that courts judicial district.
Explore case
Georgia
Apr 2025

Immigrants' Rights
Y.A.P.A. v. Trump
Emergency lawsuit filed in federal court to again halt removals under the Alien Enemies Act for people within that courts judicial district.

Georgia
Apr 2025
LGBTQ Rights
Gaines v. NCAA
The National Womens Law Center is intervening in defense of transgender athletes in a lawsuit brought against the National Collegiate Athletics Association attempting to force the organization to implement a nationwide and categorical ban on the participation of transgender college athletes. Founded in 1972, NWLC fights for gender justice working across the issues that are central to the lives of women and girls.
Explore case
Georgia
Apr 2025

LGBTQ Rights
Gaines v. NCAA
The National Womens Law Center is intervening in defense of transgender athletes in a lawsuit brought against the National Collegiate Athletics Association attempting to force the organization to implement a nationwide and categorical ban on the participation of transgender college athletes. Founded in 1972, NWLC fights for gender justice working across the issues that are central to the lives of women and girls.

Georgia
Feb 2025
Criminal Law Reform
State of Georgia v. Wierson
This case asks whether Georgias insanity defense statutes can be construed to contain an exception for cases where defendants allegedly triggered their own insanity by discontinuing their medication weeks before the alleged crimes. The State argues for such an exception, even though the text of the insanity defense statutes expressly pins the availability of the defenses to the defendants mental condition at the time of the alleged crimes. The 勛圖眻畦s State Supreme Court Initiative, along with the 勛圖眻畦 of Georgia, filed an amicus brief arguing that even if the States interpretation of the statutory text were reasonable, its argument should still be rejected because it contradicts the rule of lenity. The rule of lenity is a well-established canon of statutory construction requiring that, if a criminal statute can reasonably be interpreted in different ways, courts must adopt the interpretation most favorable to the accused.
Explore case
Georgia
Feb 2025

Criminal Law Reform
State of Georgia v. Wierson
This case asks whether Georgias insanity defense statutes can be construed to contain an exception for cases where defendants allegedly triggered their own insanity by discontinuing their medication weeks before the alleged crimes. The State argues for such an exception, even though the text of the insanity defense statutes expressly pins the availability of the defenses to the defendants mental condition at the time of the alleged crimes. The 勛圖眻畦s State Supreme Court Initiative, along with the 勛圖眻畦 of Georgia, filed an amicus brief arguing that even if the States interpretation of the statutory text were reasonable, its argument should still be rejected because it contradicts the rule of lenity. The rule of lenity is a well-established canon of statutory construction requiring that, if a criminal statute can reasonably be interpreted in different ways, courts must adopt the interpretation most favorable to the accused.

Georgia
Nov 2024
Voting Rights
Ayota v. Fall
On October 31, 2024, just five days before the November 5 General Election, Cobb County announced that it had failed to send more than 3,000 absentee ballots to Cobb County voters who had timely requested them. Many of these voters are at school hundreds of miles away or have disabilities that make it all but impossible to vote in person. The 勛圖眻畦 and co-counsel sued on behalf of affected voters to ensure that they would not be disenfranchised because of the County's administrative error.
Explore case
Georgia
Nov 2024

Voting Rights
Ayota v. Fall
On October 31, 2024, just five days before the November 5 General Election, Cobb County announced that it had failed to send more than 3,000 absentee ballots to Cobb County voters who had timely requested them. Many of these voters are at school hundreds of miles away or have disabilities that make it all but impossible to vote in person. The 勛圖眻畦 and co-counsel sued on behalf of affected voters to ensure that they would not be disenfranchised because of the County's administrative error.