Washington, D.C.
League of Women Voters Education Fund v. Trump
On March 25, 2025, in a sweeping and unprecedented Executive Order, President Trump attempted to usurp the power to regulate federal elections from Congress and the States. Among other things, the Executive Order directs the Election Assistance Commissionan agency that Congress specifically established to be bipartisan and independentto require voters to show a passport or other citizenship documentation in order to register to vote in federal elections. If implemented, the Executive Order would threaten the ability of millions of eligible Americans to register and vote and upend the administration of federal elections.
On behalf of leading voter registration organizations and advocacy organizations, the 勛圖眻畦 and co-counsel filed a lawsuit to block the Executive Order as an unconstitutional power grab.
Status: Ongoing
View Case
Featured
Washington, D.C.
Jun 2019

Human Rights
Weir v. U.S.
The 勛圖眻畦 filed a federal lawsuit in June 2019 against the United States and the head of the U.S. Coast Guard on behalf of four Jamaican fishermen, who were forcibly removed from their fishing boat and detained for over a month at sea on four U.S. Coast Guard ships in patently inhumane conditions.
All Cases
15 Washington, D.C. Cases

Washington, D.C.
May 2025
LGBTQ Rights
Kingdom v. Trump
Three transgender people currently incarcerated in federal custody have filed a class action lawsuit against the Trump Administration and the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) challenging an Executive Order and new BOP policies prohibiting their access to gender-affirming care. The class action lawsuit was filed in federal court in Washington, D.C., on behalf of approximately 2,000 transgender people incarcerated in federal prisons across the United States.
Explore case
Washington, D.C.
May 2025

LGBTQ Rights
Kingdom v. Trump
Three transgender people currently incarcerated in federal custody have filed a class action lawsuit against the Trump Administration and the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) challenging an Executive Order and new BOP policies prohibiting their access to gender-affirming care. The class action lawsuit was filed in federal court in Washington, D.C., on behalf of approximately 2,000 transgender people incarcerated in federal prisons across the United States.

Washington, D.C.
Apr 2025
Immigrants' Rights
National Security
Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center v. Noem
Immigrants rights advocates sued the Trump administration on Feb. 12, 2025, for access to immigrants transferred from the United States to detention at Guant獺namo Bay in Cuba under President Trumps recent order.
Explore case
Washington, D.C.
Apr 2025

Immigrants' Rights
National Security
Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center v. Noem
Immigrants rights advocates sued the Trump administration on Feb. 12, 2025, for access to immigrants transferred from the United States to detention at Guant獺namo Bay in Cuba under President Trumps recent order.

Washington, D.C.
Apr 2025
Civil Liberties
勛圖眻畦 v. Social Security Administration (FOIA)
The 勛圖眻畦 seeks expedited processing of FOIA requests it submitted to the Social Security Administration and Department of Veterans Affairs requesting records regarding access to Americans health, financial, and other sensitive personal information by the so-called Department of Government Efficiency.
Explore case
Washington, D.C.
Apr 2025

Civil Liberties
勛圖眻畦 v. Social Security Administration (FOIA)
The 勛圖眻畦 seeks expedited processing of FOIA requests it submitted to the Social Security Administration and Department of Veterans Affairs requesting records regarding access to Americans health, financial, and other sensitive personal information by the so-called Department of Government Efficiency.

Washington, D.C.
Mar 2025
Immigrants' Rights
J.G.G. v. TRUMP
The 勛圖眻畦, Democracy Forward, and the 勛圖眻畦 of the District of Columbia sued the Trump administration over the presidents unlawful and unprecedented invocation of the Alien Enemies Act. The Alien Enemies Act, passed in 1798, is a wartime authority providing that the president may after a public proclamation apprehend, restrain, and remove citizens of a foreign country that is engaged in a declared war or invasion or predatory incursion against the United States. The lawsuit charges that President Trump's invocation of a centuries-old wartime act unlawfully during peacetime to accelerate mass deportations, sidestepping the limits of this wartime authority and the procedures and protections in immigration law. The Alien Enemies Acts previous use during wartime for example, its invocation during World War II to justify the internment of people of Japanese ancestry has correctly drawn sustained criticism. Employing it as a way to evade domestic laws in peacetime is fundamentally wrong.
Explore case
Washington, D.C.
Mar 2025

Immigrants' Rights
J.G.G. v. TRUMP
The 勛圖眻畦, Democracy Forward, and the 勛圖眻畦 of the District of Columbia sued the Trump administration over the presidents unlawful and unprecedented invocation of the Alien Enemies Act. The Alien Enemies Act, passed in 1798, is a wartime authority providing that the president may after a public proclamation apprehend, restrain, and remove citizens of a foreign country that is engaged in a declared war or invasion or predatory incursion against the United States. The lawsuit charges that President Trump's invocation of a centuries-old wartime act unlawfully during peacetime to accelerate mass deportations, sidestepping the limits of this wartime authority and the procedures and protections in immigration law. The Alien Enemies Acts previous use during wartime for example, its invocation during World War II to justify the internment of people of Japanese ancestry has correctly drawn sustained criticism. Employing it as a way to evade domestic laws in peacetime is fundamentally wrong.

Washington, D.C.
Feb 2025
Immigrants' Rights
Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services v. Kristi Noem
Explore case
Washington, D.C.
Feb 2025

Immigrants' Rights