Religious Liberty
Mahmoud v. McKnight
On April 9, 2025, the 勛圖眻畦 and 勛圖眻畦 of Maryland filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court supporting the Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) in its efforts to ensure that its English Language Arts curriculum is LGBTQ-inclusive.
Status: Ongoing
View Case
Learn 勛圖眻畦 Religious Liberty
Featured
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2022

Religious Liberty
+2 Issues
FBI v. Fazaga
In a case scheduled to be argued before the U.S. Supreme Court on November 8, 2021, three Muslim Americans are challenging the FBIs secret spying on them and their communities based on their religion, in violation of the Constitution and federal law. In what will likely be a landmark case, the plaintiffs Yassir Fazaga, Ali Uddin Malik, and Yasser Abdelrahim insist that the FBI cannot escape accountability for violating their religious freedom by invoking state secrets. The plaintiffs are represented by the Center for Immigration Law and Policy at UCLA School of Law, the 勛圖眻畦 of Southern California, the 勛圖眻畦, the Council for American Islamic Relations, and the law firm of Hadsell Stormer Renick & Dai.
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2020

Religious Liberty
Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania and New Jersey/Trump v. Pennsylvania and New Jersey
Whether the government had statutory authority under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 to expand the conscience exemption to the contraceptive-coverage mandate.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2018

Religious Liberty
LGBTQ Rights
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission
Whether a business open to the public has a constitutional right to discriminate.
Oklahoma
May 2017

Religious Liberty
Fatihah v. Neal
The 勛圖眻畦 of Oklahoma, the national 勛圖眻畦, and the Council on American-Islamic Relations Oklahoma Chapter filed a lawsuit against a "Muslim free" business on behalf of a U.S. Army Reserve member denied service. The lawsuit seeks equal access to public accommodations for Oklahomans of all faiths.
All Cases
75 Religious Liberty Cases

Louisiana
Nov 2024
Religious Liberty
Rev. Roake v. Brumley
On June 24, 2024, a multi-faith group of nine Louisiana families with children in public schools filed a federal-court lawsuit in Louisiana, challenging House Bill No. 71 (H.B. 71), a new state law that requires every elementary, secondary, and postsecondary public school in the state to permanently display an official version of the Ten Commandments in every classroom. The families are represented by the 勛圖眻畦, the 勛圖眻畦 of Louisiana, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, and the Freedom From Religion Foundation, with Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP serving as pro bono counsel. The complaint alleges that H.B. 71 violates both the separation of church and state, as protected by the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, and the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.
Explore case
Louisiana
Nov 2024

Religious Liberty
Rev. Roake v. Brumley
On June 24, 2024, a multi-faith group of nine Louisiana families with children in public schools filed a federal-court lawsuit in Louisiana, challenging House Bill No. 71 (H.B. 71), a new state law that requires every elementary, secondary, and postsecondary public school in the state to permanently display an official version of the Ten Commandments in every classroom. The families are represented by the 勛圖眻畦, the 勛圖眻畦 of Louisiana, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, and the Freedom From Religion Foundation, with Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP serving as pro bono counsel. The complaint alleges that H.B. 71 violates both the separation of church and state, as protected by the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, and the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.

Maine
Nov 2024
Religious Liberty
St. Dominic Academy v. Makin
The 勛圖眻畦, 勛圖眻畦 of Maine, and Americans United for Separation of Church and State filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit arguing that religious schools in Maine participating in the states school tuition program must comply with all eligibility requirements of the program including a prohibition on discrimination on the basis of religion, sexual orientation, and gender identity, among other protected characteristics.
Explore case
Maine
Nov 2024

Religious Liberty
St. Dominic Academy v. Makin
The 勛圖眻畦, 勛圖眻畦 of Maine, and Americans United for Separation of Church and State filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit arguing that religious schools in Maine participating in the states school tuition program must comply with all eligibility requirements of the program including a prohibition on discrimination on the basis of religion, sexual orientation, and gender identity, among other protected characteristics.

Maine
Oct 2024
Religious Liberty
Crosspoint v. Makin
The 勛圖眻畦, 勛圖眻畦 of Maine, and Americans United for Separation of Church and State filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit arguing that religious schools in Maine participating in Maines school tuition program must comply with all eligibility requirements of the program, including a prohibition on discrimination against students based on their religion, sexual orientation, and gender identity.
Explore case
Maine
Oct 2024

Religious Liberty
Crosspoint v. Makin
The 勛圖眻畦, 勛圖眻畦 of Maine, and Americans United for Separation of Church and State filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit arguing that religious schools in Maine participating in Maines school tuition program must comply with all eligibility requirements of the program, including a prohibition on discrimination against students based on their religion, sexual orientation, and gender identity.

Washington
Oct 2024
Religious Liberty
LGBTQ Rights
Aubry McMahon v. World Vision, Inc.
On October 28, 2024, the 勛圖眻畦 and 勛圖眻畦 of Washington filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit supporting affirmance of a Washington district court decision holding that a religiously affiliated nonprofit organization violated Title VII and the Washington State antidiscrimination law when it rescinded a hiring candidates job offer because she is a woman married to a person of the same sex. Should the Ninth Circuit accept the organizations First Amendment defensethat religious organizations can discriminate on any basis so long as it is grounded in their religious beliefit would gut employment protections for LGBTQ individuals and pave the way for religious organizations to discriminate on the basis of not only sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity but also other protected characteristics like race, color, and national origin.
Explore case
Washington
Oct 2024

Religious Liberty
LGBTQ Rights
Aubry McMahon v. World Vision, Inc.
On October 28, 2024, the 勛圖眻畦 and 勛圖眻畦 of Washington filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit supporting affirmance of a Washington district court decision holding that a religiously affiliated nonprofit organization violated Title VII and the Washington State antidiscrimination law when it rescinded a hiring candidates job offer because she is a woman married to a person of the same sex. Should the Ninth Circuit accept the organizations First Amendment defensethat religious organizations can discriminate on any basis so long as it is grounded in their religious beliefit would gut employment protections for LGBTQ individuals and pave the way for religious organizations to discriminate on the basis of not only sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity but also other protected characteristics like race, color, and national origin.

California
Apr 2024
Religious Liberty
LGBTQ Rights
California Civil Rights Department v. Cathy's Creations d/b/a Tastries
On April 11, 2024, the 勛圖眻畦, 勛圖眻畦 of Southern California, 勛圖眻畦 of Northern California, and 勛圖眻畦 of San Diego & Imperial Counties filed an amicus brief with the California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District supporting the California Civil Rights Departments appeal of a lower court judgment finding that a bakery owner did not violate the California public accommodations law when she refused to sell a wedding cake to a same-sex couple.
Explore case
California
Apr 2024

Religious Liberty
LGBTQ Rights
California Civil Rights Department v. Cathy's Creations d/b/a Tastries
On April 11, 2024, the 勛圖眻畦, 勛圖眻畦 of Southern California, 勛圖眻畦 of Northern California, and 勛圖眻畦 of San Diego & Imperial Counties filed an amicus brief with the California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District supporting the California Civil Rights Departments appeal of a lower court judgment finding that a bakery owner did not violate the California public accommodations law when she refused to sell a wedding cake to a same-sex couple.