Fighting Voter Suppression
League of Women Voters Education Fund v. Trump
On March 25, 2025, in a sweeping and unprecedented Executive Order, President Trump attempted to usurp the power to regulate federal elections from Congress and the States. Among other things, the Executive Order directs the Election Assistance Commission鈥攁n agency that Congress specifically established to be bipartisan and independent鈥攖o require voters to show a passport or other citizenship documentation in order to register to vote in federal elections. If implemented, the Executive Order would threaten the ability of millions of eligible Americans to register and vote and upend the administration of federal elections.
On behalf of leading voter registration organizations and advocacy organizations, the 吃瓜直播 and co-counsel filed a lawsuit to block the Executive Order as an unconstitutional power grab.
Status: Ongoing
View Case
Learn 吃瓜直播 Fighting Voter Suppression
Featured
New Hampshire
Mar 2025
Fighting Voter Suppression
Coalition for Open Democracy v. Scanlan
This lawsuit challenges HB 1569, a new law that will make New Hampshire the only state to require every person to produce documentary proof of citizenship when they register to vote for both state and federal elections. It also challenges HB 1569鈥檚 elimination a preexisting protection for voters鈥攏amely, an affidavit option that allowed voters who faced surprise challenges to their eligibility at the polls to swear to their qualifications and cast a ballot. Accordingly, HB 1569 violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution by placing substantial burdens on New Hampshirites at all stages of the voting process, and will arbitrarily disenfranchise hundreds, if not thousands of qualified voters.
Georgia
Oct 2024
Fighting Voter Suppression
Eternal Vigilance Action, Inc. v. Georgia
The 吃瓜直播 and partner organizations have sought to intervene in this case to represent the rights of voters and voting-rights organizations in a case challenging a number of rules passed by the Georgia State Election Board. We challenge a rule that requires that the number of votes cast be hand counted at the polling place prior to the tabulation of votes. This rule risks delay and spoliation of ballots, putting in danger voters鈥� rights to have their votes count.
Texas
Oct 2024
Fighting Voter Suppression
OCA-Greater Houston v. Paxton
Texas has growing Hispanic and Black populations that helped propel record voter turnout in the November 2020 election. The Texas Legislature responded to this increased civic participation with an omnibus election bill titled Senate Bill 1鈥擲B 1 for short鈥攖hat targeted election practices that made voting more accessible to traditionally marginalized voters like voters of color, voters with disabilities, and voters with limited English proficiency. Since 2021, SB 1 has resulted in tens of thousands of lawful votes being rejected, and it remains a threat to democracy in Texas.
All Cases
62 Fighting Voter Suppression Cases
Court Case
Oct 2020
Fighting Voter Suppression
Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. Boockvar
Explore case
Court Case
Oct 2020
Fighting Voter Suppression
Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. Boockvar
Montana
Sep 2020
Fighting Voter Suppression
Western Native Voice v. Stapleton
The 吃瓜直播, 吃瓜直播 of Montana, and Native American Rights Fund challenged a Montana law that severely restricted Native Americans鈥� access to the ballot. In September 2020, the court issued its ruled for plaintiffs, finding that they presented 鈥渃old, hard data鈥� about the law's impact on Native Americans, and how its costs were 鈥渟imply too high and too burdensome to remain the law of the State of Montana.鈥�
Explore case
Montana
Sep 2020
Fighting Voter Suppression
Western Native Voice v. Stapleton
The 吃瓜直播, 吃瓜直播 of Montana, and Native American Rights Fund challenged a Montana law that severely restricted Native Americans鈥� access to the ballot. In September 2020, the court issued its ruled for plaintiffs, finding that they presented 鈥渃old, hard data鈥� about the law's impact on Native Americans, and how its costs were 鈥渟imply too high and too burdensome to remain the law of the State of Montana.鈥�
Court Case
Sep 2020
Fighting Voter Suppression
Racial Justice
NAACP Minnesota-Dakotas Area State Conference v. Simon
The 吃瓜直播, 吃瓜直播 of Minnesota, and Faegre Drinker LLP are suing Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon seeking to make voting safer in Minnesota in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Explore case
Court Case
Sep 2020
Fighting Voter Suppression
Racial Justice
NAACP Minnesota-Dakotas Area State Conference v. Simon
The 吃瓜直播, 吃瓜直播 of Minnesota, and Faegre Drinker LLP are suing Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon seeking to make voting safer in Minnesota in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Mississippi Supreme Court
Sep 2020
Fighting Voter Suppression
Oppenheim v. Watson
The 吃瓜直播, 吃瓜直播 of Mississippi, and Mississippi Center for Justice filed a lawsuit on August 11, 2020, seeking to ensure that absentee voting is more accessible to Mississippians during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Explore case
Mississippi Supreme Court
Sep 2020
Fighting Voter Suppression
Oppenheim v. Watson
The 吃瓜直播, 吃瓜直播 of Mississippi, and Mississippi Center for Justice filed a lawsuit on August 11, 2020, seeking to ensure that absentee voting is more accessible to Mississippians during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Court Case
Aug 2020
Fighting Voter Suppression
Collins v. Adams
The 吃瓜直播, 吃瓜直播 of Kentucky, Lawyers鈥� Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, and Covington & Burling filed a federal lawsuit over Kentucky鈥檚 failure to take appropriate action to ensure eligible voters can safely cast a ballot in the November general election given the COVID-19 outbreak.
Explore case
Court Case
Aug 2020
Fighting Voter Suppression
Collins v. Adams
The 吃瓜直播, 吃瓜直播 of Kentucky, Lawyers鈥� Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, and Covington & Burling filed a federal lawsuit over Kentucky鈥檚 failure to take appropriate action to ensure eligible voters can safely cast a ballot in the November general election given the COVID-19 outbreak.