LGBTQ Relationships
Obergefell, et al. v. Hodges - Freedom to Marry in Ohio
The ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥, the ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥ of Ohio and Alphonse Gerhardstein of Gerhardstein & Branch have filed suit on behalf of Jim Obergefell and David Michener, two widowers, and Robert Grunn, a funeral director, in a challenge to the Ohio constitutional and statutory marriage recognition bans.
Status: Closed (Judgment)
View Case
Learn ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥ LGBTQ Relationships
Featured
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2015

LGBTQ Relationships
Bourke v. Beshear & Love v. Beshear - Freedom to Marry in Kentucky
Bourke v. Beshear is a federal court challenge to Kentucky's constitutional ban on marriage for same-sex couples, filed by attorneys at Clay Daniel Walton & Adams and Fauver Law Office on July 26, 2013, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. The plaintiffs are four same-sex couples seeking state recognition of their out-of-state marriages.
All Cases
40 LGBTQ Relationships Cases

Oregon
Jun 2014
LGBTQ Relationships
Rummell and West v. Kitzhaber - Freedom to Marry in Oregon
The ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥, the ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥ of Oregon, and volunteer counsel from the law firms of Johnson, Johnson & Schaller, PC and Perkins Coie, LLP in December 2013 filed a federal lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Eugene on behalf of two same-sex couples who wished to marry in Oregon – Paul Rummell and Ben West, and Lisa Chickadonz and Christine Tanner – and Basic Rights Education Fund.
Explore case
Oregon
Jun 2014

LGBTQ Relationships
Rummell and West v. Kitzhaber - Freedom to Marry in Oregon
The ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥, the ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥ of Oregon, and volunteer counsel from the law firms of Johnson, Johnson & Schaller, PC and Perkins Coie, LLP in December 2013 filed a federal lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Eugene on behalf of two same-sex couples who wished to marry in Oregon – Paul Rummell and Ben West, and Lisa Chickadonz and Christine Tanner – and Basic Rights Education Fund.

North Carolina
Jun 2014
LGBTQ Relationships
Gerber and Berlin v. Cooper - Freedom to Marry in North Carolina
The ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥, the ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥ of North Carolina Legal Foundation and the law firms of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP and Ellis & Winters LLP have filed a new case in federal court on behalf of three married, same-sex couples seeking state recognition of their marriages. Because of the serious medical condition of one member of each couple, they are asking the court to take swift action.
Explore case
North Carolina
Jun 2014

LGBTQ Relationships
Gerber and Berlin v. Cooper - Freedom to Marry in North Carolina
The ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥, the ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥ of North Carolina Legal Foundation and the law firms of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP and Ellis & Winters LLP have filed a new case in federal court on behalf of three married, same-sex couples seeking state recognition of their marriages. Because of the serious medical condition of one member of each couple, they are asking the court to take swift action.

Pennsylvania
May 2014
LGBTQ Relationships
Whitewood v. Wolf - Freedom to Marry in Pennsylvania
The ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥ of Pennsylvania, the ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥, and volunteer counsel from the law firm of Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller have filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of 21 Pennsylvanians who wish to marry in Pennsylvania or want the Commonwealth to recognize their out-of-state marriages. The lawsuit alleges that Pennsylvania's Defense of Marriage Act and refusal to marry lesbian and gay couples or recognize their out-of-state marriages violates the fundamental right to marry as well as the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Explore case
Pennsylvania
May 2014

LGBTQ Relationships
Whitewood v. Wolf - Freedom to Marry in Pennsylvania
The ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥ of Pennsylvania, the ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥, and volunteer counsel from the law firm of Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller have filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of 21 Pennsylvanians who wish to marry in Pennsylvania or want the Commonwealth to recognize their out-of-state marriages. The lawsuit alleges that Pennsylvania's Defense of Marriage Act and refusal to marry lesbian and gay couples or recognize their out-of-state marriages violates the fundamental right to marry as well as the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

New Mexico
Apr 2014
LGBTQ Relationships
Griego v. Oliver - Freedom to Marry in New Mexico
Six same-sex couples, represented by the ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥, the ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥ of New Mexico, the National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR) and Albuquerque law firm Sutin, Thayer & Browne, APC, filed a lawsuit against the State of New Mexico and the Santa Fe and Bernalillo County Clerks seeking the freedom to marry. The lawsuit argues that the New Mexico marriage statutes and the New Mexico Constitution do not bar same-sex couples from marrying, and that the New Mexico Constitution requires the state to allow same-sex couples the freedom to marry.
Explore case
New Mexico
Apr 2014

LGBTQ Relationships
Griego v. Oliver - Freedom to Marry in New Mexico
Six same-sex couples, represented by the ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥, the ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥ of New Mexico, the National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR) and Albuquerque law firm Sutin, Thayer & Browne, APC, filed a lawsuit against the State of New Mexico and the Santa Fe and Bernalillo County Clerks seeking the freedom to marry. The lawsuit argues that the New Mexico marriage statutes and the New Mexico Constitution do not bar same-sex couples from marrying, and that the New Mexico Constitution requires the state to allow same-sex couples the freedom to marry.

U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2014
LGBTQ Relationships
Schmidt and Schuh v. Alaska
Same-sex couples challenging Alaska's discriminatory tax law
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2014

LGBTQ Relationships
Schmidt and Schuh v. Alaska
Same-sex couples challenging Alaska's discriminatory tax law