Racial Justice
Allen v. Milligan
Whether Alabamas congressional districts violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act because they discriminate against Black voters. We succeeded in winning a new map for 2024 elections which, for the first time, has two congressional district that provide Black voters a fair opportunity to elect candidates of their choosing despite multiple attempts by Alabama to stop us at the Supreme Court. Despite this win, Alabama is still defending its discriminatory map, and a trial was held in February 2025 to determine the map for the rest of the decade.
In May 2025, a federal court ruled that Alabama's 2023 congressional map both violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and was enacted by the Alabama Legislature with racially discriminatory intent.
Status: Ongoing
View Case
Learn 勛圖眻畦 Racial Justice
Featured
Arizona
Oct 2023

Racial Justice
Criminal Law Reform
Fund for Empowerment v. Phoenix, City of
Fund for Empowerment is a challenge to the City of Phoenixs practice of conducting sweeps of encampments without notice, issuing citations to unsheltered people for camping and sleeping on public property when they have no place else to go, and confiscating and destroying their property without notice or process.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2023

Racial Justice
Women's Rights
United States v. Rahimi
Whether 18 U.S.C. 禮 922(g)(8), which prohibits the possession of firearms by persons subject to domestic-violence restraining orders, violates the Second Amendment on its face.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2023

Racial Justice
Muldrow v. City of St. Louis
Do employees claiming that they have been denied a transfer because of their race have to demonstrate in addition that the transfer caused a significant material disadvantage?
Court Case
Jun 2020

Racial Justice
Defy Ventures, Inc. v. Small Business Administration
Suing the Trump administration to lift its unlawful exclusion of businesses owned by people with criminal records from being eligible for Paycheck Protection Act funds
California
Mar 2019

Racial Justice
MediaJustice, et al. v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, et al.
On March 21, 2019, the 勛圖眻畦 and MediaJustice, formerly known as "Center for Media Justice," filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit seeking records about FBI targeting of Black activists. The lawsuit enforces the 勛圖眻畦 and MediaJustices right to information about a 2017 FBI Intelligence Assessment that asserts, without evidence, that a group of so-called Black Identity Extremists poses a threat of domestic terrorism. The Intelligence Assessment was widely disseminated to law enforcement agencies nationwide, raising public concern about government surveillance of Black people and Black-led organizations based on anti-Black stereotypes and First Amendment protected activities.
Court Case
Aug 2015

Racial Justice
Disability Rights
S.R. v. Kenton County Sheriff's Office
A deputy sheriff shackled two elementary school children who have disabilities, causing them pain and trauma, according to a federal lawsuit filed today by the 勛圖眻畦, the Children's Law Center, and Dinsmore & Shohl.
All Cases
125 Racial Justice Cases

California
Sep 2023
Racial Justice
Women's Rights
Liapes v. Facebook, Inc.
Explore case
California
Sep 2023

Racial Justice
Women's Rights
Liapes v. Facebook, Inc.

Court Case
Jul 2023
Racial Justice
Free Speech
Pernell v. Lamb
On Thursday, August 18, 2022 the 勛圖眻畦, 勛圖眻畦 of Florida, Legal Defense Fund and Ballard Spahr filed a lawsuit challenging Florida's HB7 (aka the Stop W.O.K.E. Act) on behalf of a group of Florida educators and students in higher education.
Explore case
Court Case
Jul 2023

Racial Justice
Free Speech
Pernell v. Lamb
On Thursday, August 18, 2022 the 勛圖眻畦, 勛圖眻畦 of Florida, Legal Defense Fund and Ballard Spahr filed a lawsuit challenging Florida's HB7 (aka the Stop W.O.K.E. Act) on behalf of a group of Florida educators and students in higher education.

U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2023
Racial Justice
Brackeen v. Haaland
On August 18, 2022 the 勛圖眻畦, along with 12 勛圖眻畦 state affiliates and represented by Cooley LLP, filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court urging the court to uphold the constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Act.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2023

Racial Justice
Brackeen v. Haaland
On August 18, 2022 the 勛圖眻畦, along with 12 勛圖眻畦 state affiliates and represented by Cooley LLP, filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court urging the court to uphold the constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Act.

U.S. Supreme Court
May 2023
Racial Justice
Voting Rights
Harness v. Watson (Amicus)
Whether Mississippis 1890 felony disenfranchisement law, adopted for the express purpose of disenfranchising Black voters, violates the Fourteenth Amendments Equal. Protection Clause.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2023

Racial Justice
Voting Rights
Harness v. Watson (Amicus)
Whether Mississippis 1890 felony disenfranchisement law, adopted for the express purpose of disenfranchising Black voters, violates the Fourteenth Amendments Equal. Protection Clause.

South Carolina
Mar 2023
Racial Justice
Smart Justice
Brown v. Lexington County, et al
This case is part of a nationwide fight against criminalization of poverty and, specifically, debtors' prisons. On June 1, 2017, the 勛圖眻畦's Racial Justice Program, the 勛圖眻畦 of South Carolina, and Terrell Marshall Law Group PLLC filed a federal lawsuit challenging the illegal arrest and incarceration of indigent people in Lexington County, South Carolina, for failure to pay fines and fees, without determining willfulness or providing assistance to counsel. Those targeted by this long-standing practice could avoid jail only if they paid the entire amount of outstanding court fines and fees up front and in full. Indigent people who were unable to pay were incarcerated for weeks to months without ever seeing a judge, having a court hearing, or receiving help from a lawyer. The result was one of the most draconian debtors prisons uncovered by the 勛圖眻畦 since 2010.
Explore case
South Carolina
Mar 2023

Racial Justice
Smart Justice
Brown v. Lexington County, et al
This case is part of a nationwide fight against criminalization of poverty and, specifically, debtors' prisons. On June 1, 2017, the 勛圖眻畦's Racial Justice Program, the 勛圖眻畦 of South Carolina, and Terrell Marshall Law Group PLLC filed a federal lawsuit challenging the illegal arrest and incarceration of indigent people in Lexington County, South Carolina, for failure to pay fines and fees, without determining willfulness or providing assistance to counsel. Those targeted by this long-standing practice could avoid jail only if they paid the entire amount of outstanding court fines and fees up front and in full. Indigent people who were unable to pay were incarcerated for weeks to months without ever seeing a judge, having a court hearing, or receiving help from a lawyer. The result was one of the most draconian debtors prisons uncovered by the 勛圖眻畦 since 2010.