LGBTQ Rights
Mahmoud v. Taylor
On April 9, 2025, the ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥ and ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥ of Maryland filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court supporting the Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) in its efforts to ensure that its English Language Arts curriculum is LGBTQ-inclusive.
Status: Ongoing
View Case
Learn ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥ LGBTQ Rights
Featured
Florida
Nov 2023

LGBTQ Rights
+2 Issues
Students for Justice in Palestine at the University of Florida v. Raymond Rodrigues
The University of Florida chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine filed a lawsuit on November 16, 2023, challenging the Chancellor of the State University System of Florida’s order to state universities to deactivate the student group. This order threatens the students’ constitutionally-protected right to free speech and association in violation of the First Amendment. The ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥ and its partners are seeking a preliminary injunction that would bar the Chancellor and the University of Florida from deactivating the UF SJP.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2020

LGBTQ Rights
R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes v EEOC & Aimee Stephens
Aimee Stephens had worked for nearly six years as a funeral director at R.G. and G.R. Harris Funeral Homes when she informed the funeral home’s owner that she is a transgender woman. She was fired, the EEOC sued on her behalf, and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Aimee’s employer engaged in unlawful sex discrimination when it fired her because she’s transgender. We represented Aimee Stephens in front of the U.S. Supreme Court — and won.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2019

LGBTQ Rights
Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda
Don Zarda loved to skydive. He worked as a skydiving instructor at Altitude Express, a company on Long Island, N.Y. He was fired for being gay.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2018

LGBTQ Rights
Religious Liberty
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission
Whether a business open to the public has a constitutional right to discriminate.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2015

LGBTQ Rights
Obergefell, et al. v. Hodges - Freedom to Marry in Ohio
The ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥, the ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥ of Ohio and Alphonse Gerhardstein of Gerhardstein & Branch have filed suit on behalf of Jim Obergefell and David Michener, two widowers, and Robert Grunn, a funeral director, in a challenge to the Ohio constitutional and statutory marriage recognition bans.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2015

LGBTQ Rights
Bourke v. Beshear & Love v. Beshear - Freedom to Marry in Kentucky
Bourke v. Beshear is a federal court challenge to Kentucky's constitutional ban on marriage for same-sex couples, filed by attorneys at Clay Daniel Walton & Adams and Fauver Law Office on July 26, 2013, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. The plaintiffs are four same-sex couples seeking state recognition of their out-of-state marriages.
All Cases
187 LGBTQ Rights Cases

Court Case
May 2009
LGBTQ Rights
Advocacy on Behalf of Gay Men Verbally Abused by McDonald's Staff
The ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥ is representing two gay men in an official complaint to the Louisville Human Relations Commission after an employee at a McDonald's restaurant in downtown Louisville called them and three friends a series of anti-gay slurs.
Explore case
Court Case
May 2009

LGBTQ Rights
Advocacy on Behalf of Gay Men Verbally Abused by McDonald's Staff
The ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥ is representing two gay men in an official complaint to the Louisville Human Relations Commission after an employee at a McDonald's restaurant in downtown Louisville called them and three friends a series of anti-gay slurs.

Court Case
Apr 2008
LGBTQ Rights
Outing at Hollis F. Price Middle College High School
Explore case
Court Case
Apr 2008

LGBTQ Rights
Outing at Hollis F. Price Middle College High School

Court Case
Mar 2008
LGBTQ Rights
In re Hadaway
Georgia custody/adoption denial
Explore case
Court Case
Mar 2008

LGBTQ Rights
In re Hadaway
Georgia custody/adoption denial

Court Case
Mar 2008
LGBTQ Rights
Domestic Partnership Advocacy on Behalf of Konica Minolta Employee
Explore case
Court Case
Mar 2008

LGBTQ Rights
Domestic Partnership Advocacy on Behalf of Konica Minolta Employee

U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2008
LGBTQ Rights
Engquist v. Oregon Department of Agriculture
Whether public employees who are subject to arbitrary discrimination can raise an equal protection claim without also being required to show that the discrimination was based on membership in a protected class.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2008

LGBTQ Rights
Engquist v. Oregon Department of Agriculture
Whether public employees who are subject to arbitrary discrimination can raise an equal protection claim without also being required to show that the discrimination was based on membership in a protected class.