Gerrymandering
Allen v. Milligan
Whether Alabamas congressional districts violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act because they discriminate against Black voters. We succeeded in winning a new map for 2024 elections which, for the first time, has two congressional district that provide Black voters a fair opportunity to elect candidates of their choosing despite multiple attempts by Alabama to stop us at the Supreme Court. Despite this win, Alabama is still defending its discriminatory map, and a trial was held in February 2025 to determine the map for the rest of the decade.
In May 2025, a federal court ruled that Alabama's 2023 congressional map both violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and was enacted by the Alabama Legislature with racially discriminatory intent.
Status: Ongoing
View Case
Learn 勛圖眻畦 Gerrymandering
Featured
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2025

Gerrymandering
Callais v. Landry
Whether the congressional map Louisiana adopted to cure a Voting Rights Act violation in Robinson v. Ardoin is itself unlawful as a gerrymander.
South Carolina Supreme Court
Jan 2025

Gerrymandering
League of Women Voters of South Carolina v. Alexander
This case involves a state constitutional challenge to South Carolinas 2022 congressional redistricting plan, which legislators admit was drawn to entrench a 6-1 Republican majority in the states federal delegation. Plaintiff the League of Women Voters of South Carolina has asked the states Supreme Court to conclude that the congressional map is an unlawful partisan gerrymander that violates the state constitution.
All Cases
28 Gerrymandering Cases

Colorado Supreme Court
Aug 2024
Gerrymandering
League of Women Voters of Greeley, Weld County v. Board of County Commissioners of Weld County (Amicus)
When drawing its new maps, the Weld County Board of County Commissioners violated Colorado law imposing specific requirements meant to guarantee that county commission districts are drawn transparently and fairly, such that voters are empowered to elect responsive and accountable commissioners. A Colorado district court granted summary judgment to voter plaintiffs who challenged the maps, but the Board appealed the decision, arguing in part that voters lacked standing and a right of action to challenge the unlawful districts.
Explore case
Colorado Supreme Court
Aug 2024

Gerrymandering
League of Women Voters of Greeley, Weld County v. Board of County Commissioners of Weld County (Amicus)
When drawing its new maps, the Weld County Board of County Commissioners violated Colorado law imposing specific requirements meant to guarantee that county commission districts are drawn transparently and fairly, such that voters are empowered to elect responsive and accountable commissioners. A Colorado district court granted summary judgment to voter plaintiffs who challenged the maps, but the Board appealed the decision, arguing in part that voters lacked standing and a right of action to challenge the unlawful districts.

U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2024
Gerrymandering
Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP (Congressional Map Challenge)
South Carolina unlawfully assigned voters to congressional districts based on their race and intentionally discriminated against Black voters in violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2024

Gerrymandering
Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP (Congressional Map Challenge)
South Carolina unlawfully assigned voters to congressional districts based on their race and intentionally discriminated against Black voters in violation of the Equal Protection Clause.

Utah Supreme Court
Jul 2024
Gerrymandering
Utah State Legislature v. League of Women Voters (Amicus)
This case involves a state constitutional challenge to the Utah Legislatures 2021 redistricting plan, which was drawn to entrench the majority political partys power and to discriminate against Utahns whose political expression aligns with an opposition political party. The 勛圖眻畦 and the 勛圖眻畦 of Utah filed an amicus brief in support of the challenge in the Utah Supreme Court, explaining why the redistricting map violates Utahns free-expression rights and why courts have the authority to block the map as unconstitutional.
Explore case
Utah Supreme Court
Jul 2024

Gerrymandering
Utah State Legislature v. League of Women Voters (Amicus)
This case involves a state constitutional challenge to the Utah Legislatures 2021 redistricting plan, which was drawn to entrench the majority political partys power and to discriminate against Utahns whose political expression aligns with an opposition political party. The 勛圖眻畦 and the 勛圖眻畦 of Utah filed an amicus brief in support of the challenge in the Utah Supreme Court, explaining why the redistricting map violates Utahns free-expression rights and why courts have the authority to block the map as unconstitutional.

Kansas
Jul 2024
Gerrymandering
Coca v. City of Dodge City
Dodge City's (Kansas) at-large method of election for its city commission violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) by diluting the political power of the citys Latine community. The at-large method of election also violates the Fourteenth Amendment because it is operated with a discriminatory purpose.
Explore case
Kansas
Jul 2024

Gerrymandering
Coca v. City of Dodge City
Dodge City's (Kansas) at-large method of election for its city commission violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) by diluting the political power of the citys Latine community. The at-large method of election also violates the Fourteenth Amendment because it is operated with a discriminatory purpose.

Court Case
Apr 2024
Gerrymandering
Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity Inc v. Raffensperger
The 勛圖眻畦 and civil rights groups filed a lawsuit against Georgia's newly drawn maps which deny Black residents an equal opportunity to participate in the political process and elect candidates of choice.
Explore case
Court Case
Apr 2024

Gerrymandering
Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity Inc v. Raffensperger
The 勛圖眻畦 and civil rights groups filed a lawsuit against Georgia's newly drawn maps which deny Black residents an equal opportunity to participate in the political process and elect candidates of choice.