Free Speech
Students for Justice in Palestine at the University of Florida v. Raymond Rodrigues
The University of Florida chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine filed a lawsuit on November 16, 2023, challenging the Chancellor of the State University System of Floridas order to state universities to deactivate the student group. This order threatens the students constitutionally-protected right to free speech and association in violation of the First Amendment. The 勛圖眻畦 and its partners are seeking a preliminary injunction that would bar the Chancellor and the University of Florida from deactivating the UF SJP.
Status: Ongoing
View Case
Learn 勛圖眻畦 Free Speech
Featured
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2023

Free Speech
Molina v. Book
Whether police officers violated clearly established First Amendment rights when they tear-gassed plaintiffs for serving as legal observers in a public protest.
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2023

Free Speech
OConnor-Ratcliff v. Garnier and Lindke v. Freed
The 勛圖眻畦, the 勛圖眻畦 of Northern California, and the 勛圖眻畦 of Southern California filed amicus briefs in support of everyday people fighting for government transparency and accountability in two cases set for review by the U.S. Supreme Court this Term: OConnor-Ratcliff v. Garnier and Lindke v. Freed.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2021

Free Speech
Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.
On September 25, 2017, the 勛圖眻畦-PA filed suit on behalf of B.L., a high school sophomore who has been cheerleading since she was in fifth grade and was expelled from the team as punishment for out-of-school speech.
All Cases
146 Free Speech Cases

Court Case
May 2020
Free Speech
勛圖眻畦 v. Department of Defense
The 勛圖眻畦 and 勛圖眻畦 of Montana filed a lawsuit on September 4, 2018 asking a federal court to order several federal government agencies to turn over all records concerning their plans to surveil and police anticipated Keystone XL pipeline protests.
Explore case
Court Case
May 2020

Free Speech
勛圖眻畦 v. Department of Defense
The 勛圖眻畦 and 勛圖眻畦 of Montana filed a lawsuit on September 4, 2018 asking a federal court to order several federal government agencies to turn over all records concerning their plans to surveil and police anticipated Keystone XL pipeline protests.

Court Case
May 2020
Free Speech
勛圖眻畦 v. Department of Defense
The 勛圖眻畦 and 勛圖眻畦 of Montana filed a lawsuit on September 4, 2018 asking a federal court to order several federal government agencies to turn over all records concerning their plans to surveil and police anticipated Keystone XL pipeline protests.
Explore case
Court Case
May 2020

Free Speech
勛圖眻畦 v. Department of Defense
The 勛圖眻畦 and 勛圖眻畦 of Montana filed a lawsuit on September 4, 2018 asking a federal court to order several federal government agencies to turn over all records concerning their plans to surveil and police anticipated Keystone XL pipeline protests.

U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2020
Free Speech
United States v. Sineneng-Smith
Whether the First Amendment prohibits the government from making it a crime to encourage or induce a non-citizen to enter or reside in the United States unlawfully.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2020

Free Speech
United States v. Sineneng-Smith
Whether the First Amendment prohibits the government from making it a crime to encourage or induce a non-citizen to enter or reside in the United States unlawfully.

U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2019
Free Speech
Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org
Whether, under the First Amendment, the government can copyright government materials that lack the force of law.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2019

Free Speech
Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org
Whether, under the First Amendment, the government can copyright government materials that lack the force of law.

U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2019
Free Speech
Iancu v. Brunetti
Whether the prohibition on the federal registration of immoral or scandalous trademarks violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2019

Free Speech
Iancu v. Brunetti
Whether the prohibition on the federal registration of immoral or scandalous trademarks violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment.