Immigrants' Rights
Featured
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2021

Immigrants' Rights
Innovation Law Lab v. Wolf
The 勛圖眻畦, Southern Poverty Law Center, and Center for Gender & Refugee Studies filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Trump administrations new policy forcing asylum seekers to return to Mexico and remain there while their cases are considered.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2021

Immigrants' Rights
National Security
Sierra Club v. Trump Challenge to Trumps National Emergency Declaration to Construct a Border Wall
In February 2019, the 勛圖眻畦 filed a lawsuit challenging President Trumps emergency powers declaration to secure funds to build a wall along the southern border. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition. The lawsuit argues that the president is usurping Congresss appropriations power and threatening the clearly defined separation of powers inscribed in the Constitution. On January 20, 2021, President Biden halted further border wall construction. Litigation in this and subsequent related challenges has been paused or deadlines extended while the 勛圖眻畦s clients and the Biden administration determine next steps.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2020

Immigrants' Rights
Department of Homeland Security v. Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam
Whether immigrants are entitled to seek judicial review of their expedited removal orders in federal court.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2020

Immigrants' Rights
International Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump
The 勛圖眻畦 and other partner organizations filed a federal lawsuit challenging President Trumps Muslim ban executive order, charging it violates the Constitution including the First Amendments prohibition of government establishment of religion and the Fifth Amendments guarantees of equal treatment under the law and federal laws.
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2019

Immigrants' Rights
Nielsen v. Preap
Whether the government can require that certain people are detained for the duration of their deportation proceedings without a hearing because they have past criminal records.
Court Case
May 2018

Immigrants' Rights
Colotl v. Kelly
UPDATE 5/25/18: The Department of Homeland Security has agreed to renew Jessica Colotls Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and work permit to resolve a lawsuit brought by the 勛圖眻畦, the 勛圖眻畦 of Georgia, and Kuck Baxter Immigration in May 2017 against DHS for arbitrarily terminating Jessicas DACA and rejecting her renewal application.
Indiana
Oct 2016

Immigrants' Rights
National Security
Exodus Refugee Immigration, Inc. v. Mike Pence, et al
The 勛圖眻畦 and the 勛圖眻畦 of Indiana, on behalf of Exodus Refugee Immigration, filed suit against Governor Mike Pence and the secretary of the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration to stop attempts to suspend resettlement of Syrian refugees, claiming the governors actions violate the United States Constitution and federal law.
All Cases
172 Immigrants' Rights Cases

Court Case
Mar 2020
Immigrants' Rights
U.T. v. Barr
The 勛圖眻畦, National Immigrant Justice Center, Center for Gender & Refugee Studies, and Human Rights First filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Trump administrations policies regarding so-called safe third country agreements with Guatemala and other nations that force people fleeing for their lives to seek asylum in the same dangerous region they fled.
Explore case
Court Case
Mar 2020

Immigrants' Rights
U.T. v. Barr
The 勛圖眻畦, National Immigrant Justice Center, Center for Gender & Refugee Studies, and Human Rights First filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Trump administrations policies regarding so-called safe third country agreements with Guatemala and other nations that force people fleeing for their lives to seek asylum in the same dangerous region they fled.

U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2019
Immigrants' Rights
Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California
Whether the federal courts are precluded from reviewing the lawfulness of the federal governments rescission of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program under the Administrative Procedure Act because the decision is one that is committed to agency discretion by law?
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2019

Immigrants' Rights
Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California
Whether the federal courts are precluded from reviewing the lawfulness of the federal governments rescission of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program under the Administrative Procedure Act because the decision is one that is committed to agency discretion by law?

Court Case
Oct 2019
Immigrants' Rights
A.I.I.L. v. Sessions
The 勛圖眻畦 filed a federal lawsuit seeking damages on behalf of thousands of traumatized children and parents who were forcibly torn from each other under the Trump administrations illegal practice of separating families at the border.
Explore case
Court Case
Oct 2019

Immigrants' Rights
A.I.I.L. v. Sessions
The 勛圖眻畦 filed a federal lawsuit seeking damages on behalf of thousands of traumatized children and parents who were forcibly torn from each other under the Trump administrations illegal practice of separating families at the border.

Court Case
Sep 2019
Immigrants' Rights
Make the Road New York v. Wolf
The 勛圖眻畦, American Immigration Council, and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Trump administrations new rule that massively expands fast-track deportations without a fair legal process such as a court hearing or access to an attorney.
Explore case
Court Case
Sep 2019

Immigrants' Rights
Make the Road New York v. Wolf
The 勛圖眻畦, American Immigration Council, and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Trump administrations new rule that massively expands fast-track deportations without a fair legal process such as a court hearing or access to an attorney.

U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2019
Immigrants' Rights
Ovalles v. Barr & Guerrero-LaSprilla v. Barr
Whether a lawful permanent resident convicted of a crime can appeal a final removal order, where the court denied judicial review because it found that he lacked diligence for equitable tolling purposes.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2019

Immigrants' Rights
Ovalles v. Barr & Guerrero-LaSprilla v. Barr
Whether a lawful permanent resident convicted of a crime can appeal a final removal order, where the court denied judicial review because it found that he lacked diligence for equitable tolling purposes.