
Coalition on Homelessness v. City and County of San Francisco
What's at Stake
Coalition on Homelessness is a challenge to the City and County of San Francisco’s efforts to criminalize homelessness through an array of unconstitutional practices, including confiscating and destroying the personal property of unhoused people without adequate notice or due process, and citing and arresting unhoused people for sleeping in public.
Summary
In September 2022, the ³Ô¹ÏÖ±²¥ of Northern California and the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area filed a on behalf of the Coalition on Homelessness and several individual plaintiffs against the City and County of San Francisco and Mayor London Breed, challenging their unconstitutional treatment of unhoused San Franciscans. The lawsuit sought to end the City’s practice of unlawfully seizing and destroying unhoused people’s personal property and citing and arresting unhoused people for sleeping in public, despite having no shelter to go to.
For years, San Francisco has responded to its homelessness crisis by pushing unhoused people out of sight—destroying their survival items and arresting and jailing them for unavoidable behavior like sleeping in public. These regressive mass incarceration-era policies do nothing to address the City’s affordable housing crisis, and only perpetuate homelessness.
In December 2022, a federal judge in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued a in the , directing San Francisco to immediately halt its unconstitutional enforcement of laws that criminalize homelessness and to stop unlawfully seizing and destroying unhoused people’s survival gear and personal property. In granting the order, the Court also acknowledged that the City’s cruel policies have made it more difficult for people to exit homelessness. In January 2024, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld this order.
In June 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in City of Grants Pass v. Johnson that the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the Eighth Amendment does not prohibit cities from punishing unhoused people for sleeping in public, even if they have nowhere else to go. That ruling prevented the plaintiffs from pursuing similar claims in this case, but it did not affect the plaintiffs’ remaining claims, which focus on the City's unlawful destruction of the personal property of unhoused persons. Those claims have survived several motions for dismissal by the City and are headed to trial during the summer of 2025.
Legal Documents
-
09/27/2022
Complaint -
09/27/2022
Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction -
11/03/2022
Defendants' Motion to Dismiss -
11/15/2022
Defendants' Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction -
11/17/2022
Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion to Dismiss -
11/28/2022
Defendants' Reply ISO Motion to Dismiss -
12/01/2022
Plaintiffs' Reply ISO Motion for Preliminary Injunction -
12/23/2022
Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction -
01/12/2023
Order on Motion to Dismiss -
05/23/2023
Order on Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint -
06/06/2023
Second Amended Complaint -
12/04/2024
Order on City’s Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint and Motion for Judgement on the Pleadings -
12/18/2024
Third Amended Complaint -
01/23/2025
Partial Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint -
02/06/2025
Plaintiffs' Opposition to Partial Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint -
02/13/2025
Defendants’ Reply ISO Partial Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint -
04/03/2025
Defendants' Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment -
04/17/2025
Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment -
04/24/2025
Defendants' Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment
Date Filed: 09/27/2022
Court: District Court (N.D. Cal.)
Affiliate: Northern California
Date Filed: 09/27/2022
Court: District Court (N.D. Cal.)
Affiliate: Northern California
Date Filed: 11/03/2022
Court: District Court (N.D. Cal.)
Affiliate: Northern California
Date Filed: 11/15/2022
Court: District Court (N.D. Cal.)
Affiliate: Northern California
Date Filed: 11/17/2022
Court: District Court (N.D. Cal.)
Affiliate: Northern California
Date Filed: 11/28/2022
Court: District Court (N.D. Cal.)
Affiliate: Northern California
Date Filed: 12/01/2022
Court: District Court (N.D. Cal.)
Affiliate: Northern California
Date Filed: 12/23/2022
Court: District Court (N.D. Cal.)
Affiliate: Northern California
Date Filed: 01/12/2023
Court: District Court (N.D. Cal.)
Affiliate: Northern California
Date Filed: 05/23/2023
Court: District Court (N.D. Cal.)
Affiliate: Northern California
Date Filed: 06/06/2023
Court: District Court (N.D. Cal.)
Affiliate: Northern California
Date Filed: 12/04/2024
Court: District Court (N.D. Cal.)
Affiliate: Northern California
Date Filed: 12/18/2024
Court: District Court (N.D. Cal.)
Affiliate: Northern California
Date Filed: 01/23/2025
Court: District Court (N.D. Cal.)
Affiliate: Northern California
Date Filed: 02/06/2025
Court: District Court (N.D. Cal.)
Affiliate: Northern California
Date Filed: 02/13/2025
Court: District Court (N.D. Cal.)
Affiliate: Northern California
Date Filed: 04/03/2025
Court: District Court (N.D. Cal.)
Affiliate: Northern California
Date Filed: 04/17/2025
Court: District Court (N.D. Cal.)
Affiliate: Northern California
Date Filed: 04/24/2025
Court: District Court (N.D. Cal.)
Affiliate: Northern California